Bankruptcy Questions Answered

Co-Signing Your Way To A 1009C

Practicing Consumer Bankruptcy Law is very interesting work. Usually, I get to tell bankruptcy clients good news. Sometimes, I have to deliver bad news about their bankruptcy cases. In a recent case, a young man purchased his first home several years ago, and naturally, the value of the home has dropped significantly. He tried modification and was turned down flat (The mortgage is held by a securitized trust). That wasn't the bad part.

The bad part, as you can tell from the title is that he had his Grandfather co-sign for the loan. So, during the course of the bankruptcy when this young man couldn't get the lender to modify, he asked me: Can I short sale the property, and if so, what will happen to me, and what will happen to my Grandfather? These are both excellent questions.

Here is my advice: Yes, as an option, you can do a short sale. Of course, since you are in a Chapter 13, we will need the Judge's permission, and I will have to file a motion with the Court to allow same, but that is not a problem. I don't believe that the Judge will require any additional items from you other than a signed contract. With regard to the deficiency and you, the answer is simple, your debt will be included in the bankruptcy and you will ultimately receive your discharge, so, no problem.

The problem is: How will a short sale on your primary residence hurt you or hurt your grandfather? As to your grandfather, we have to look at a whole new set of issues. Since this property is not his primary residence, any deficiency that is still owed to the lender will have to be dealt with. This can come in two forms: First, they can pursue him for a deficiency balance. In other words, they can sue him for the remaining balance owed on the promissory note. As I have explained in the past, it's kind of like having two fish on a hook and one gets away. The lender still has one fish to reel in (Grandpa)

When the lender wins the lawsuit, they could go after his non-exempt assets. Alternatively, the lender could just issue him a 1099C cancellation of debt. If the lender takes the second option, your grandfather would have to deal with the IRS. As such, I would advise him to see a CPA for tax advice on how to combat this issue.

All and all, it is not fun to have to explain this to someone who took a risk on purchasing a first home and then sat back and watched his investment disappear as the Southwest Florida real estate market crumbled to the ground.

Now, I just hope the relationship doesn't crumble as well.

I apologize for the depressing blog, but this is something that you need to know and need to prevent in the future. When you take a risk, you want to do it on your own so that you don't jeopardize anyone else's future. It is never worth that risk.

This post was submitted by Carmen Dellutri, Esq., founder of The Dellutri Law Group, P.A. Currently, the firm has offices in Port Charlotte, Fort Myers, Naples and Sarasota. Mr. Dellutri also sits on the Board of American Board of Certification. Mr. Dellutri is also one of the founders of the Bankruptcy Law Network, Debt Law Network, Credit Law Network, and Mortgage Law Network. Mr. Dellutri also writes for the firm's personal injury litigation blog, www.faircreditreportingactblog.com and www.fairdebtcollectionpracticesactblog.com, and the firm's mortgage modification blog.

Does a Bankruptcy Really Stop a Foreclosure?

Tags: Monies, Petition, Proceeding, Ramifications, Repayment Schedule

Chapter 13 Debtors’ Tax Refunds: Spend Or Turn Over To Trustee?

Many taxpayer rely on their tax refunds to pay certain expenses they cannot afford on their normal salary. People who have filed Chapter 13 bankruptcy sometimes ask me what happens to their tax refunds during their bankruptcy. Do they have to hand over their refund to the Chapter 13 trustee, or can they keep their refund as long as they are current on their bankruptcy plan payments?

In most cases, a tax refund is part of the bankruptcy estate and must be surrendered to the trustee who would allocate the refund to the creditors. In our bankruptcy court the Chapter 13 exercises some discretion and may permit a debtor to keep a future refund for "emergencies" or priority expenses. Medical expenses and reasonable home repairs usually are consider valid reasons for keeping a tax refund, for example. The trustee can permit the debtor to apply a tax refund to pay property taxes for his home if they are not paid by the mortgage lender.

It is important that debtors request permission to keep tax refunds before they spend the refund. A Chapter 13 should ask their bankruptcy attorney to submit a request on their behalf as soon as they know the refund amount. Do not spend your refund unless your attorney tells you they have actually received trustee approval. If the trustee denies your request then you must surrender the tax refund to the Chapter 13 trustee.

Supreme Court: Bankruptcy Law Doesn’t Violate Lawyers’ Rights

A case decided by the Supreme Court this week settles a question of attorneys' free speech rights raised by a Minnesota law firm concerned about restriction in the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005 (BAPCPA), according to the Washington Post.

Here are the pertinent details:

• The law states that bankruptcy lawyers are prohibited from advising clients to take on more debt before filing for bankruptcy. In theory, the restriction is meant to prevent advice that would lead to actions that might constitute fraud under U.S. bankruptcy laws.
• The question raised by the Minnesota law firm was one of free speech for lawyers. Apparently, the firm suggested that the aforementioned restriction amounted to an unconstitutional violation of the free speech rights of bankruptcy lawyers.
• The court decided that the law was not, in fact, unconstitutional, and that lawyers can give their clients any advice that does not promote defrauding the bankruptcy court.
  • Filing incomplete or inaccurate information
  • Attempting to pay a "favorite" creditor in full before filing for bankruptcy
  • Failing to disclose assets or expected income
  • Attempting to “give away” assets before filing

The Broader Issue

While the law firm’s concern with free speech may seem piddling here, in the context of bankruptcy cases, it has merit. In some cases, as the WSJ article points out, taking on certain kinds of debt immediately before a bankruptcy filing could benefit both the filer and his or her creditors.

For example, refinancing a troublesome mortgage to better allow a debtor to make payments could benefit all parties. The Supreme Court Justices reportedly acknowledged the truth of this and agreed that taking on more debt can, at times, be the wisest decision for a potential bankruptcy filer.

But, the court noted, the law can be read to mean that bankruptcy lawyers are restricted only from giving their clients advice that would lead to bankruptcy fraud.

What Constitutes Bankruptcy Fraud?

Bankruptcy fraud is a serious matter – in fact, it can lead a court to throw out your case (and thus eliminate your chances at receiving a debt discharge) and earn you fines and jail time. This is one reason why working with a bankruptcy lawyer can be helpful.

Bankruptcy fraud includes:

How To Start A New Bankruptcy Law Practice: Helpful Hints

From time to time I am approached by a younger bankruptcy attorney who says that my bankruptcy blog has helped his new bankruptcy practice. Bankruptcy law is more difficult than when I handled my first case and new bankruptcy attorneys face more complexity and more competition than I did. I have read several articles by other bankruptcy attorneys about how to market a new bankruptcy practice. One I read recently, with good advice, was written by New York bankruptcy attorney Jay Fleischman. Jay has an excellent blog called the Legal Practice Pro which is dedicated to lawyer marketing in general and bankruptcy marketing in particular. If you are an attorney with a new bankruptcy practice you really should subscribe to his blog.

I have my own suggestion to add to the many helpful hints Jay has offered in several of his blog articles. When asked, I always advise younger attorneys to seek a relationship with a bankruptcy paralegal who works, or has worked, in an active bankruptcy practice. An experienced bankruptcy paralegal can help a new attorney with many practical aspects of petition preparation and dealing on a day-to-day basis with the bankruptcy court and bankruptcy trustees. Bankruptcy paralegal cannot help you during their regular work day, but they can (with their employer’s permission) assist new attorneys after work or on weekends.

I think an attorney will find it much easier to communicate with and receive practical bankruptcy guidance from a paralegal than from another bankruptcy attorney. Of course, it will cost you much less to pay for a paralegal’s help. Many bankruptcy paralegals and legal secretaries face economic challenges similar to your own clients, and they would appreciate some additional income.

I have encouraged my own paralegal, who has 10 years experience, to assist other attorneys on her own time. I want to help attorneys getting into the bankruptcy field. I find it much easier to offer my paralegal’s time than to commit my own time to assist other lawyers.

LifeLock Fined for Inappropriate Identity Theft Protection Claims

A company that made bold promises about its ability to protect against identity theft has settled with the Federal Trade Commission after the validity of its claims was questioned.

LifeLock is a company that protects customers' identities from theft, and alerts customers about identity theft security breaches, according to the company web site. LifeLock will even help consumers if their identity is stolen, by canceling and replacing stolen cards and verifying information changes.

According to federal regulators, however, LifeLock has made claims about its ability to protect customers from identity theft that it cannot uphold, leading to an agreement for the company to pay $12 million in settlements.

CNNMoney is reporting that the fine will settle charges that LifeLock made deceptive claims about its identity theft protection abilities. $11 million of the fine will go to the FTC, while another $1 million will go to a group of attorneys general from around the country. According to the FTC, this is one of the largest joint settlements between the FTC and the states.

According to the chairman of the FTC, Jon Liebowitz, LifeLock claimed that it could protect consumers against identity theft completely, including all types of identity theft.

The protection it actually provided, said the chairman, left enough holes that you could drive a truck through it.

LifeLock advertises its services in a brash manner, by displaying the social security number of the company's CEO, Todd Davis, on the side of a truck that drives around in public, as well as on national television commercials. This show of confidence is meant to publicize their $10 per month services that they claim will keep users safe from identity theft.

The case that the FTC made against LifeLock was that the company made "deceptive claims" about its protection services. Among these claims were that LifeLock could guarantee protection against identity theft, and that, according to CNNMoney, "it was the first company to prevent identity theft from occurring."

There are certain types of identity theft that LifeLock claimed it could protect against, and the FTC argued that these fraud alerts did not actually protect against one of the most common types of identity theft: the misuse of existing accounts.

There was also the charge that LifeLock claimed, falsely, to be able to prevent changes to customers' address listings that weren't authorized, and that it constantly monitored customer credit report activity.

The FTC also said that LifeLock made untrue statements about data security, claiming that sensitive data was only accessed on a "need-to-know" basis. According to the FTC, however, LifeLock collected social security numbers and credit card numbers on a routine basis.

Davis, the CEO of LifeLock, said of the settlement that he was pleased with it, and that it would help to establish the advertising standards for the identity theft protection industry. He went on to say that the activities in the FTC charges were from several years ago, and that LifeLock agreed to settle the case as a way to put the issues behind them.

We agreed to settle this matter, he said, in order to quickly put this behind us so we can get back to doing what we do best—helping to protect our members from identity theft.

Chapter 13 Debtor Can May Make Some Payments Directly To Secured Creditors

The general rule in Chapter 13 bankruptcy is that the debtor makes one monthly payment to the Chapter 13 trustee who then distributes monthly payments to the debtor’s creditors- the trustee is the collection agent for all creditors. Some debtors ask whether they can pay one or more of their creditors directly each month; its called making payments "outside the plan."

Why would a debtor want to make payments outside the plan. Possibly, to minimize the costs of Chapter 13 bankruptcy. The bankruptcy trustee charges a fee to administer a Chapter 13 payment plan. The fee ranging from 6% to 10% is assessed against all plan payments collected and administered. Debtor payments outside the plan directly to creditors are not subject to the trustee fee.

Our bankruptcy court will permit payments to secured creditors outside the plan if the debtor has arranged for automatic payments to the creditor from the debtor’s employer or his bank account. The automatic payments system must have been in place before the debtor filed his Chapter 13 petition.

Tags: Debt Advice, Debt Problem, Debt Situation, Individual Voluntary Arrangement, Petition

FTC: Identity Theft Top Complaint in 2009; Potential Data Breach

The Federal Trade Commission recently issued its annual report on consumer complaints filed in the last 12 months (summary available here, for the complete report, see below).

Identity theft was by far the largest complaint category, concerning 21 percent of all complaints filed. The top fifteen list looks like this:

• Identity theft (21 percent)
• Third party and creditor debt collection (nine percent)
• Internet services (six percent)
• Shop-at-home and catalog sales (six percent)
• Foreign money offers and counterfeit check scams (five percent)
• Internet auctions (four percent)
• Credit cards (three percent)
• Prizes, sweepstakes and lotteries (three percent)
• Advance-fee loans and credit protection/repair (three percent)
• Banks and Lenders (two percent)
• Credit bureaus, information furnishers and report users (two percent)
• Television and electronic media (two percent)
• Health care (two percent)
• Business opportunities, employment agencies and work-at-home plans (two percent)
• Computer equipment and software (two percent)

The FTC reports that identity theft complaints also constituted the largest single group of consumer worries last year, but have dropped as an overall percentage of the whole. In addition to the release of 2009’s data, the FTC has posted an animated video detailing how and when to file a complaint (available here).

A Potential Data Breach You Should Know About

In another recent news release, the FTC noted that it has warned almost 100 companies that information they store on peer-to-peer websites (used for everything from playing video games to sharing text, audio and video files to conducting online phone calls) may be vulnerable to data breaches.

Specifically, if peer-to-peer (P2P) software is improperly configured, any sensitive data may be accessible to anyone on the network. This presents a huge security risk, and could lead to identity theft or other costly and frustrating scams.

What this could mean for you is that, if you have given your personal information to one of the companies in question, your information could be at risk.

While no companies have necessarily broken the FTC’s regulations regarding storage of sensitive information, some may be at risk for significant future data breaches.

Additional Resources

FTC 2009 Full Report on Consumer Complaints.

The Bankruptcy Trustee Is Not The Debtor’s Friend

Once in a while our office gets a call from the Chapter 13 Trustee or one of the Chapter 7 trustees telling us that one of our clients called or wrote their office about an issue in or question about their case. We then contact the client and explain to them that when they are represented by an attorney in a bankruptcy case their attorney should handle all communications with their bankruptcy trustee. Why would a bankruptcy debtor bypass their attorney and speak directly to a trustee?

I think some clients try dealing directly with their trustee because they believe they will get a faster response, and some may think they will be charged legal fees if they asked their attorney to call the trustee (rarely true). In some cases the debtor wants to verify, or have explained, an answer they have already received from their bankruptcy attorney.

One of our bankruptcy trustees discussed this issue at a meeting with a group of bankruptcy attorneys. The trustee told the attorney group that when a represented bankruptcy debtor calls his office he assumes that there may be a problem in the bankruptcy case. His assistant will always review the bankruptcy file for unresolved issues or overlooked facts. More often than not, his review will result in problems for the debtor.

The Trustee told the attorneys that, "no good thing can happen from a (debtor) calling a trustee." He advised us to explain to our bankruptcy clients that the trustee is not the debtor’s friend.

‘Presidential Reunion’ Shows Need for Consumer Financial Protection

A viral video taking over the internet this week brings together some comedy heavyweights, plus director Ron Howard, to educate consumers about the need for a Consumer Financial Protection Agency.

"Presidential Reunion" brings together presidential impersonators from the past 35 years of "Saturday Night Live," including Will Ferrel as George W. Bush, Dana Carvey as George Bush, Sr., Chevy Chase as Gerald Ford and Fred Armisen as President Barack Obama. The video also features Jim Carrey as Ronald Reagan.

In the video (see it below), President Obama is struggling with opposition to the Consumer Financial Protection Act by congress and lobbyists. He is then visited by the six previous presidents (including the late Reagan and Ford). Bush, Jr., and Clinton (played by Darrel Hammond) explain how they eased restrictions on banks, helping to create the financial mess in which the nation finds itself. Later, Jimmy Carter (played by Dan Aykroyd) explains in clear terms the benefits of the proposed CFPA.

"Mr. President, you have to establish the Consumer Financial Protection Agency. People are tired of being ripped off by credit card companies and banks," he says.

The video was made in conjunction with the Main Street Brigade, an organization committed to bringing awareness to, and dispelling myths about the CFPA.

The act was first suggested to Congress by Harvard professor Elizabeth Warren, author of several studies about consumer credit and bankruptcy.

Credit Cards 101: Visa

If you're a Visa cardholder, you probably received a packet of updated policies and terms of use for your card, related to the new credit card laws. However, even if you did read all the fine print, you still may be curious of the intricacies of how your Visa card works.

An interesting post from FiveCentNickel.com offers a look at Visa’s rules that merchants must follow if they accept Visa cards. Here’s a summary.

• What to take: Vendors can choose whether to accept credit and business cards, debit cards and gift cards, or both.
• No price limits: If a merchant accepts Visa cards, it is required to accept the cards for any transaction, regardless of its dollar amount. However, many merchants ignore this policy and set a minimum purchase amount to encourage spending. If you’re irritated by a specific vendor’s policy, consider speaking to a manager.
• Near equality: Items bought with Visa cards cannot be subjected to any special charge, but vendors can offer customers discounts for paying with cash (you may notice this especially at gas stations).
• Convenience fees: Online and over-the-phone transactions may be subject to extra charges, so long as they’re disclosed and not applied to any in-person transactions.
• No cash tax: Sellers cannot collect taxes from Visa transactions in cash.
• Tip not included: When you pay with a Visa card and intend to add a tip, vendors can only authorize your account for the amount of the service minus tip.
• No cash returns: If you buy something with a Visa card, sellers cannot give you cash should you return it.
• Time crunch: Merchants have to report Visa sales receipts within five days of purchase.
• Privacy limits: Receipts for Visa transactions should only show the final four digits of your card number and should not show your card’s expiration date. Further, sellers have to keep all account number information private.
• Policy disclosure: Vendors must explain (or make available) return and exchange policies before a customer makes a purchase.
• Signature required: Unsigned cards are considered invalid. If a cashier encounters one, she is supposed to make the customer sign the card and compare the signature to one on an ID card. Writing “ask for ID card” in lieu of a signature is considered an invalid substitute.
• ID optional: Merchants may ask for a photo ID, but cannot require buyers to have one in order to complete a transaction.

It’s always a good idea to make sure you know the rules of your debit or credit card, so if you don’t have a Visa, check out your cardholder’s website!

Additional Resources

Just the Facts about Credit Cards (PDF)

A Consumer’s Guide to Credit Cards (PDF)

Bankruptcy Court Set To Require Mortgage Lenders To Negotiate Mortgage Modifications With Chapter 13 Debtors

The Orlando bankruptcy court is preparing to adopt a rule providing for mandatory mediation between homeowners and their mortgage companies to facilitate mortgage modification. Congress rejected a change in the bankruptcy code that would have empowered Chapter 13 debtors to force reduction in their first mortgage principal to their residence’s current fair market value. This proposed procedural rule will not circumvent the bankruptcy code and will not force reduction of first mortgage principal. What the rule will do is enable Chapter 13 debtors by motion filed with the court to compel a bank representative with full authority to modify mortgages to meet with the debtor and an independent mediator to negotiate in good faith a possible modification of the debtor’s first mortgage terms. The terms and the conditions of the rule are expected to be announced shortly. This bankruptcy rule should be a big help to debtors who want to save their primary residence from foreclosure.

The Florida Supreme Court is requiring mediation in state court foreclosure cases. This state court rule is helpful, but the bankruptcy court rule could be better for homeowners. Before getting to mediate with a bank agent with full authority the homeowner has to be in a foreclosure case. The homeowner first has to stop paying the mortgage for at least three months, wait for the bank to file a lawsuit, hire a civil attorney to answer the lawsuit, proceed for several months in civil litigation, and then at some point, arrange for a court ordered mediation. The result of the mediation is a contractual agreement to modify the mortgage, and the modification usually calls for a few months of trial payments before it is binding.

Chapter 13 mediation should be faster and more definitive. A debtor probably can get an order requiring mediation with their mortgage lender very soon after filing a Chapter 13 bankruptcy petition. The borrower/debtor will not have to miss several mortgage payments and fall farther behind on their mortgage. There will probably be uniform court orders. The bankruptcy rule probably will permit a court order adopting any mediated mortgage modification which order can be recorded in the public real estate records.

Handling Student Loans Outside of Bankruptcy

As a recent article from the Wall Street Journal highlights, student loan debt is a huge burden for many Americans. But, unlike credit card debts, student loans cannot typically be discharged in a bankruptcy filing.

And now, as layoffs and salary reductions become more and more common around the country, many once-comfortable graduates are finding themselves unable to meet the terms of their loans. Here are some ways you can handle your student debt.

Know Your Numbers

If you need to rework the terms of your student loans, consider contacting your lender. But before you do so, take these preparatory steps:

• Outline your budget: Crunch the numbers and figure out what you can realistically afford to pay each month.
• Read the fine print: Make sure you understand the terms of your loans as they now stand so that you’ll be ready to ask for specific modifications when you speak with your lender.

Once you’ve determined what kinds of payments you can make, familiarize yourself with your options for repayment. Depending on your circumstances, these may include the following:

• Modify your repayment plan: Some lenders offer graduated repayment schedules, meaning you pay more per month as you go along (which can be useful if you expect to make more money in the future). If your loans are through the Federal Government, visit the Federal Direct Loan web site to see your choices.
• Consider a deferment: Many lenders offer you a chance to defer payments for a variety of reasons (such as going back to school, working in certain fields, being unemployed, etc.). Check with your lender to see how to apply, but keep in mind that interest will likely still accrue during the deferral period.
• Apply for forbearance: You may also be able to make reduced payments or suspend payments altogether for reasons of financial hardship but, as with deferments, interest will likely still build up.
• Look at consolidation: Consolidation offers often prove helpful because they allow you to make a single payment each month and can even help lower interest rates. But be sure you understand the complete terms—some come with prepayment penalties.

If you’re just beginning school and considering loan options, remember that they may not seem like a big burden at this stage, but can add up quickly and should be considered carefully.

Additional Resources

Federal Student Loans: Learn the Basics and Manage Your Debt (PDF)

Sen. Jim Bunning Holds Up Unemployment Benefits Extension

Unemployment benefits for 400,000 Americans are set to run out in the next week, and a bill that could extend them is being held up by a lone Senator.

Sen. Jim Bunning, a Republican from Kentucky and former Major League Baseball pitcher, has objected to extending jobless benefits, which are attached to a larger spending bill that was past unanimously by the House last week.

The New York Times reports that 4,300 of Bunning's own constituents will exhaust their unemployment benefits in the next week, and that number will surely continue to rise over the coming weeks and months.

In New York, about 54,300 jobless workers are set to see their benefits run out next week, the most of any state, according to the Labor Department. Florida and Georgia follow, with approximately 49,600 and 41,000 workers losing benefits after March 13, respectively.

Bunning, who is not seeking reelection this year, has received praise from fellow Senate Republicans for taking his controversial stance.

The $10 billion bill up before the Senate would use stimulus money to extend unemployment insurance for jobless workers, and resume work for 2,000 Department of Transportation workers on highway construction projects.

About The Bankruptcy Blog

The Bankruptcy blog provides news and information on the economy, financial trends and bankruptcy information.

Chapter 7 Trustees Offer Debtors Practical Tips Concerning Valuation And Buy-Backs Of Personal Property

The bankruptcy committee of our local Bar association holds monthly luncheons. At the most recent luncheon two Chapter 7 bankruptcy trustees discussed the bankruptcy process from the trustee’s point of view and offered a few good suggestions to debtors’ attorneys. One of there comments concerned the treatment of debtors’ household furnishings. Florida law provides each debtor with a $1,000 total exemption for all personal property including bank accounts and household furnishings. This exemption is small compared to most other state’s laws. In practice, few trustees pursue personal property valued slightly over the exemption nor challenge property valuations in most Chapter 7 petitions unless there is a clear reason to doubt the debtor’s property list.

At the bar meeting the trustees suggested that the Chapter 7 trustees may be taking a closer look at personal property lists and values. They indicated that most trustees may be sending an appraiser to the debtors homes to take an inventory whenever the debtor’s home is valued more than $500,000. It is hard to believe, they said, that a home worth more than a half million dollars in today’s real estate market contains less than $2,000 (joint filing) of furniture and electronic equipment. The trustees stated that bankruptcy debtors whose homes and personal property lists will likely be scrutinized consider hiring their own appraiser to value their property before they file their petition and submit their own personal property appraisal to the trustee.

It costs only two or three hundred dollars for an appraisal of household property. In the past, when my clients’ income or house size implied expensive furnishings I have suggested the client retain one of the appraisal firms used by the Chapter 7 trustees so that the trustee would not challenge the appraiser’s credentials.

Whenever a debtor suspects that his personal property schedules will be questioned by the bankruptcy trustee it is a very good ideal to get a preemptive appraisal. When you hire the appraisal you schedule the date and time of the appraisal. You’ll know well in advance when this appraiser will be going through your home to inspect your belongings. Your own appraisal is not binding, and you don’t have to use the results on your petitions is you disagree in good faith with the appraiser’s report.

The trustee speakers offered debtors another practical suggestion when the debtors know they have non-exempt personal property including furniture or automobiles. Typically, trustees and bankruptcy debtors negotiate the amount and terms of the debtor’s "buy-back" of non-exempt cars and personal property at or after the trustee meeting. These trustees suggested that debtors decide what they would like to offer the trustee in payment and then bring a cashiers check for the amount of their offer to the trustee meeting. In other words, make your offer an literally put the cash on the table. The trustees said they are usually willing to accept significantly lower valuations and buy-back offers when the offer is accompanied by certified funds.

Shortcomings of Credit CARD Act

This week saw the much-anticipated date (February 22) on which the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act (Credit CARD Act) took full effect. And, while it theoretically introduces many new consumer protections, it leaves plenty room for “creativity” from card issuers.

Center for Responsibility Lending Responds

The Center for Responsible Lending released a humorous (though cynical) animated video that highlights some of the areas not addressed by the new act—and illustrates ways in which credit card issuers have adapted their policies to maintain profit levels. These include:

• Interest rate hikes: To compensate for lost revenue, some card issuers have already raised users’ interest rates. Even users in good standing may be “forcibly eligible” for this, as the video claims.
• Over-limit fees: If you accidentally exceed your credit limit, your cardholder likely charges a fee. And, with new restrictions in place on other charges they can assess, you might see this fee jump.
• Inactivity fees: On the other hand, if you use your card too infrequently, you might see a fee for that, as well, because that means you’re less profitable for the company.
• Increased minimum payments: Another technique some card issuers are using is to up the minimum amount you can pay each month. This could be profitable for those who won’t be able to afford the increased payments and can be charged an under-payment fee.

The Regulation-Creativity Relationship

As the video illustrates with a graph, more consumer protection may seem like a good thing, but in practice, it often means that card issuers just get more “creative” with fees they charge reasons they charge them.

If you’re thinking now is a good time to get out of credit cards altogether, you’re not alone, but, before you cancel your cards, consider this:

• Your credit score: Part of your credit score is based on age of accounts (older ones are better); another part is based on diversity of credit (so eliminating one type entirely would hurt you).
• Your reentry: If, at some future time, you decide you want a credit card again, you’ll likely have to contend with uber-high interest rates (above 70 percent) because you won’t have any recent credit card history.

The video exaggerates a little (by mentioning, for example, a “legibility fee” for left-handed users), but by doing so draws attention to the more serious matter of how significantly your credit card could change.

Be sure to read all correspondence from your card issuer, even mailings that seem like junk: some of them might contain important details about the new rates and fees you may have to pay. These statements will also come in handy if mounting fees and interest force you into bankruptcy.

Additional Resources

Credit CARD Act

Filing for Bankruptcy - These Things Are OK

Bankruptcy is filled with land-mines. Therefore, if you are thinking about filing for Bankruptcy, you must be careful. We previously listed this a list of Bankruptcy Don'ts. Here is a list of Bankruptcy Do's that we give to our clients.

· Do take the bankruptcy court seriously, and avoid making any financial decisions that may make your creditors suspect you of filing in bad faith.

· Do seek bankruptcy court counsel before you file any papers, and learn your rights and options under the United States bankruptcy code.

· Do maintain timely payments on any collateralized loans that you wish to keep the collateral for. In other words, if you have a mortgage or car payment and you intend to keep the house or car, you must remain current on the payment. (Please alert us if you are not current on a collateralized loan at the time we are preparing your case for filing.)

· Do file your tax returns. Even if you know that you owe the IRS a lot of money, it is still important to file your taxes in a timely fashion. Not filing will only exacerbate the problem.

· Do reduce the amount of future income tax refunds. Refunds are routinely taken in Chapter 7 cases, and may affect plan payments in Chapter 13. If you expect to get an income tax refund , reduce your withholding so that you do not get a refund . If much of the refund id from the Earned Income Tax Credit, apply to get that available at www.irs.gov/pub.irs-fill/fw5.pdf or through your employer. For more information, see the IRS web page. Caution: Do not reduce the withholding for tax so much that you will have a big tax bill to pay.

· Do be honest and forthcoming on your bankruptcy petition. Even if it is embarrassing, it is important that your attorney knows. Any creditors not listed on your petition may not be discharged.

· Do keep our office up to date with your contact information. Mailing address, phone and email.

· Do consider increasing your 401K contribution if you have excess income and you are filing a Chapter 13.

This post was submitted by Carmen Dellutri, Esq., founder of The Dellutri Law Group, P.A. Currently, the firm has offices in Port Charlotte, Fort Myers, Naples and Sarasota. Mr. Dellutri also sits on the Board of American Board of Certification. Mr. Dellutri is also one of the founders of the Bankruptcy Law Network, Debt Law Network, Credit Law Network, and Mortgage Law Network. Mr. Dellutri also writes for the firm's personal injury litigation blog, www.faircreditreportingactblog.com and www.fairdebtcollectionpracticesactblog.com, and the firm's mortgage modification blog.

Filing for Bankruptcy - Don’t Do These Things

If you are going to file for Bankruptcy or are thinking of filing for bankruptcy, you have to be careful because you don't want to take any action which may come back to bite you in the end. Here is a list of Bankruptcy Don'ts that we give to our clients.

· Don’t pay your relatives or friends in favor of your other creditors, and don’t try to transfer property out of your name and into theirs. If you do, the bankruptcy trustee may sue them on behalf of your creditors to get the money back.

· Don’t transfer any property to a relative within one year of filing your case. The Trustee may even go back five (5) years from filing the case if the transfer was for a fraudulent purpose such as avoiding paying your creditors.

· Don’t take a loan against your real estate in an effort to reduce the equity. You can often file a bankruptcy and not lose this valuable asset. If you take out a second mortgage to pay a credit card debt, you may be putting your house at risk.

· Don’t pay ahead or pay off balances early on secured loans (loans for which there is collateral).

· Don’t pay ahead or pay off balances early on unsecured loans (personal loans, medical bills, credit cards or store cards, etc.).

· Don’t attempt to sell your property for less than what it’s worth. This will not reduce the amount you eventually have to repay – and you or whoever you sold it to may end up stuck with the difference.

· Don’t run up your credit card debt prior to filing a bankruptcy. The court may view this as an attempt to exploit the bankruptcy system, and the judge may treat it accordingly.

· Don’t buy any luxury items prior to filing for bankruptcy. Any luxury items purchased within 70 days of filing for bankruptcy are viewed as non-dischargeable debt.

· Don’t take any major cash advances off of credit cards prior to filing for bankruptcy. The court may suspect that you are acting in bad faith and may refuse to discharge the debt.

· Don’t borrow, withdraw from or cash out your 401K, IRA, or ERISA qualified savings and retirement plans to pay bills. If you do, you may be liable for penalties and taxes that are not protected by the bankruptcy filing. If you don’t use these funds, you are very likely to have them to draw on after bankruptcy.

· Don’t file if you are about to receive a tax refund or inheritance. Discuss the timing with your attorney.

· Don’t transfer money in to your kid’s bank accounts. They have you as a co-signer and are subject to the same review as your bank accounts.

· Don’t get married just before filing if your spouse has high income.

· Don’t misrepresent facts to your attorney we are working to help you.

· Don’t wait until after filing to purchase a vehicle, if you know you will need a more dependable car please take care of that before filing your case. Each case is different if you need to do this please contact the attorney first.

· Don’t assume that the bankruptcy will get rid of all your debts. Some tax liabilities are non-dischargeable (basically, all tax liability accrued in the three tax years prior to filing are non-dischargeable in most circumstances). Student loans are now non-dischargeable except in cases of extreme hardship.

· Don’t tell your attorney that certain items of personal property do not belong to you if they really do belong to you.

· Don’t expect your Attorney to help you defraud the Bankruptcy Court and your creditors, it won’t happen.

· Don’t lie you will be signing the bankruptcy papers under penalty of perjury.

This post was submitted by Carmen Dellutri, Esq., founder of The Dellutri Law Group, P.A. Currently, the firm has offices in Port Charlotte, Fort Myers, Naples and Sarasota. Mr. Dellutri also sits on the Board of American Board of Certification. Mr. Dellutri is also one of the founders of the Bankruptcy Law Network, Debt Law Network, Credit Law Network, and Mortgage Law Network. Mr. Dellutri also writes for the firm's personal injury litigation blog, www.faircreditreportingactblog.com and www.fairdebtcollectionpracticesactblog.com, and the firm's mortgage modification blog.

More Mortgage Relief in Proposed Changes to Obama Plan

FOX Business recently reported that it obtained a document leaked from the federal Treasury Department that outlines proposed changes to the Making Home Affordable program - also known as the Home Affordable Modification Program, or HAMP. The plan is part of the Obama Administration’s attempt to provide some home foreclosure help.

Some experts suggest the rules are unlikely to pass because they would mean more work, and potentially less income, for many mortgage lenders and loan servicers. This issue, according to some, highlights the core problems with that industry.

The Proposed Mortgage Rule Changes

Here’s a look at what alterations have allegedly been suggested and what they reveal about the way HAMP and the mortgage lending system in general is currently working, and how it could better work to help people avoid bankruptcy and stay in their homes:

1. Introduction of a 30-day “borrower response period.” This period would begin after a borrower was denied a mortgage modification; during the 30 days, mortgage lenders would be prohibited from foreclosing on properties. The aim is to provide a window in which borrowers can determine whether their denial resulted from mistakes in their application.

Those in the know suggest that this proposed change is necessary because a number of borrowers are being denied modifications because of mistakes in their application – not because they don’t actually qualify.

2. Prohibition of foreclosures for borrowers who have not been proven ineligible for modifications. In other words, banks would be required to offer borrowers an alternative to foreclosure (namely, modification) and would not be permitted to foreclose on a home if a borrower proved eligible for that modification.

According to sources, this type of language already exists in some form in HAMP – in fact, that’s part of the whole purpose of the program. The inclusion of this as a proposed modification suggests that mortgage lenders are not taking adequate steps to avoid foreclosing on properties.

3. Suspension of all foreclosure action once a borrower has been approved for a 90-day trial modification. HAMP requires a trial period. In this 90-day window, approved borrowers make payments under a modified mortgage plan. If they adhere to the terms, they should qualify for a permanent modification.

The fact that a new rule expressly prohibiting foreclosure action during the trial period has been proposed suggests that lenders are disregarding modification agreements and proceeding to foreclose regardless of a borrower’s status.

4. Written verification (from a trustee or lawyer) that a borrower does not qualify for HAMP before foreclosure can proceed. In other words, this rule would require banks to have proof that they can go ahead and foreclose.

This suggests that mortgage lenders have not been following this rule on their own, and have perhaps been foreclosing on properties even when a borrower qualified for a modification.

Bottom Line For Anyone Needing Mortgage Relief

If you are at risk of losing your home to foreclosure, you may want to contact a bankruptcy attorney. These proposed rules suggest the cards may be stacked against you.

Debtors’ Revenge: Debtor Can Seek Sanction Against Creditors That Fail to Dissolve Bank Garnishment Following Bankruptcy Filing

As soon as you file bankruptcy an "automatic stay" legally goes into effect which prohibits creditors from taking any action to collect a debt. If a creditor has served a writ of garnishment against your bank account the garnishment action and collection of money from your bank account is stayed by the bankruptcy. In the past, creditors would stop taking additional action to seize bank money pursuant to a garnishment upon the debtor filing bankruptcy but the creditor also would do nothing on its own initiative to cancel or dissolve the garnishment. If the account had money exempt in the bankruptcy the debtor would have to pursue legal action within his bankruptcy case to dissolve the creditor’s garnishment.

Bankruptcies filed after bank garnishment is common because the garnishment of the debtor’s accounts often precipitates bankruptcy. There have been some bankruptcy cases which have placed upon the creditor an obligation to take affirmative steps to release any garnishments on accounts, or levies on automobiles(not repossessions), upon the debtor’s filing a bankruptcy petition. The cases state that if the creditor fails to take such affirmative action against its own garnishment the bankruptcy court can and will impose sanctions against the creditor.

Bankruptcy debtors can hold accountable creditors that fail to immediately dissolve pending garnishments and levies after the debtor files bankruptcy. If you file bankruptcy when a bank has already garnished your bank account your lawyer can send an email and letter to the bank attorney who served the garnishment in which your lawyer can notify the attorney of the garnishment and demand that the attorney and his client dissolve the garnishment within a short time such as two or three days. If the bank’s attorney ignores the demand the your attorney can file a motion for monetary sanctions and attorneys fees to be levied upon the creditor.

Your Car in Bankruptcy

For many people considering filing for bankruptcy, it’s important to know whether they’ll be able to get on with their lives afterward—and for many, that will be determined by whether or not they have a car.

And, with car issues in the news pretty often these days, they’re certainly on our minds. Here’s a little crash course on what you can expect to happen to your car if you file for bankruptcy.

Chapter 7 & Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

Whether you file under Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, you can expect an automatic stay to take effect. This stay prevents debt collection, wage garnishment, lawsuits related to your finances, foreclosure and repossession.

The automatic stay remains effective until the court discharges your case.

Cars in Chapter 7 Bankruptcy

Chapter 7 bankruptcy offers filers a complete discharge of many unsecured debts. Your car loan, though, is a secured debt (it’s attached to property—your car). If you file a Chapter 7 case, you’ll have three options for your car loan:

• Redeem: This option involves one lump sum payment to your creditor for the car’s current fair market value. If you can afford to do this, it may make life easier in the future, since you’ll have eliminated car payments. But because most people file for bankruptcy at a time when cash is not handy, it may not be a viable option for many filers.
• Reaffirm: This option allows you to essentially continue making payments on your lease or loan as you did before you filed for bankruptcy. In reaffirming your debt, you agree a second time to continue making payments according to a schedule agreed upon by both you and your creditor.
• Surrender: If neither continuing payments nor redeeming the car will work for you financially (for example, if you owe more on the car than it’s currently worth), you can also choose to surrender your vehicle to your creditor and have the remainder of your debt discharged.

Cars in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy

If you file under Chapter 13 bankruptcy, your car’s future will depend on when you bought it.

• Newer cars: If you bought your car within 910 days of your bankruptcy filing, you’re required to pay the full value of the car loan, though your interest rate may be reduced.
• Older cars: If you purchased your car more than 910 days before filing for bankruptcy, you’re only required to repay the car’s current fair market value.

Additional Resources

Understanding Vehicle Financing (PDF)

Understanding Vehicle Repossession (PDF)

New Consumer Credit Card Rules Take Effect

Good news for credit card holders—the final set of provisions under the Credit Card Act of 2009 take effect today, offering some important consumer protections.

For those who use credit cards responsibly, the new laws will provide more time to pay bills and less likelihood for fees, penalties and interest rate changes. For those struggling with credit cards or facing bankruptcy, the laws may prevent fees from adding up and provide a little breathing room.

Here's a look at some of the key provisions that are now in effect:

• Expanded Statements: Your monthly card statement will have a few new features, including broken down fees and penalties and a chart showing how long it will take to pay off the charges making only the minimum payment (and how much it will cost). Your statement will also arrive at least 21 days before the due date, a full week earlier.
• 45 Day Notices: Your credit card issuer must give advance warning of any changes to your account, particularly interest rate changes. This will give you more time to consider the changes, negotiate with the credit card company, or, if necessary, pay off the balance and close the account.
• No Rate Increases for 1 Year: The new law prohibits "arbitrary" rate increases for the first year you hold an account. Lawmakers hope this will curb "universal defaults", in which one card issuer raises interest rates due to late payment on a card issued by a different bank. Some actions could still trigger a rate increase, such as being more than 60 days delinquent.
• Over-Limit Opt-in: You will only be charged over-limit fees if you agree to it. While this may seem like a blessing, it also means more transactions may be declined.

While these changes went into effect, many cardholders have seen changes to their account over the past year, since the law was introduced. Credit card companies have been preparing for the law to go into effect, and in many cases have not been acting in consumers' best interest.

Many credit card companies have been raising interest rates and introducing new annual fess (which are permitted in the new law) in order to prepare for the revenue losses that could come under the Credit CARD Act.

For more information, visit the Federal Reserve's credit card site.

Chapter 13 Debt Limits Set To Rise: Many People Still Denied 13 Relief By High Mortgage Debts

The 2005 bankruptcy law was supposed to encourage, or require, many debtors to file a Chapter 13 repayment bankruptcy instead of a Chapter 7 "wipe out" bankruptcy. People who make too much money relative to expenses usually fail the Chapter 7 means test and are forced into Chapter 13. Not exactly. The problem is that Chapter 13 has debt ceilings. Regardless of how badly you flunk the means test you are ineligible to file Chapter 13 if your secured debts total more than approximately $1,000,000 or if your unsecured debts total more than approximately $350,000.

These debt limits frequently close people out of Chapter 13 even if they are willing to pay what they can afford to creditors. Blame it on the housing bubble. The great housing inflation not only raised prices, but it also increased mortgage amounts. Liberal issuance of second mortgages took peoples total mortgages even higher. Many people now filing bankruptcy became insolvent because of the depreciation of investment real estate- more mortgages. All homestead mortgages and all investment property mortgages count as secured debts to the extent they remain secured by property value. Upside down mortgages are secured debts to extent of current property value and are unsecured debts to the extent of the deficiency. The sum of this mortgage debt is throwing many people out of Chapter 13.

If you don’t qualify for Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 you have two alternatives. One is Chapter 11 bankruptcy, but Chapter 11 is a very complicated procedure and involves legal fees- mostly over $20,000, which few individual debtors can afford. Chapter 11 procedures are appropriate for large corporate bankruptcy. The only other alternative for people who cannot file 7 or 13 is to face creditor lawsuits without any bankruptcy protection.

The Chapter 13 debt limits increase effective April 1, 2010. The increase is only 3%. The debt ceilings will not significantly rise. The April, 2010, increase will not solve the problem.

If a debt is contingent or unliquidated that debt does not count toward Chapter 13 debt limits. A debt is contingent if the debtor will owe them only if something happens in the future. A purchaser’s debt to a seller may be contingent upon the seller delivering the product at a future date. An unliquidated debt is owed now, but the debtor does not know the amount and cannot determine the amount. If a debtor has been sued, and the court found the debtor liable but the damage award is undecided then the debtor is facing an unliquidated claim.

If you think your debts exceed Chapter 13 limits check with an attorney to see if the attorney believes that some of your debts may be either legally contingent or unliquidated.

Consumer Protection Alert: Scammers Using BBB Name

The Better Business Bureau (BBB) is a private company that works to promote honesty in the marketplace so that both buyers and sellers can conduct business in a trusting environment. The various branches of the BBB assess businesses on their dependability and warn consumers about scams.

Unfortunately, according to msnbc.com, a new scam cropping up has been using the BBB’s logo to swindle people out of money. Here’s what you need to know to protect yourself and your money.

• It starts with an email or phone call. Like many similar scams, the one using the BBB’s logo reportedly involves a scammer contacting you and indicating that you’ve won a lottery or contest.
• It pays attention to detail. Some victims have noted that scammers used names of real BBB employees and even included in their emails links to bios on real BBB websites.
• A check will arrive. When it does, the scammers will ask that you deposit it and wire them a certain amount of money to cover taxes or fees or some other imaginary cost associated with the imaginary contest.

If you deposit the check, it may clear, but that doesn’t mean the scam is legitimate. If you wire away money, consider it gone forever—this is a classic maneuver some scammers make.

Protect Yourself: Know the Facts

While this scam can be devastating for those who lose money, it’s entirely avoidable. The following are classic warning signs that what you’re being offered is a scam:

• Unknown contest: If you’ve been told you’ve won something you don’t remember entering, ignore it. Hang up the phone, delete the email and walk away. Consider filing a complaint with the FTC.
• Money wires: Any time you have to pay to collect your winnings, know that something is up. Federal law prohibits charging to join sweepstakes and any legitimate organization would take out taxes and fees before sending you a check – how do they know you’d send the money back?
• High emotions: Many scammers rely on drumming up excitement or fear in their victims because when we’re in elevated emotional states, even the savviest among us can make poor financial decisions.

Be on the lookout for any of these signs or anything else that strikes you as off. Sources indicate that some scammers have gotten very sophisticated and use realistic-looking seals, watermarks and color printing, but remember: legitimate offers will still be good after you review them with a trustworthy source.

Be sure to check out businesses on the BBB web site. Legitimate businesses will also let you know their BBB rating. Total Bankruptcy has a BBB A+ rating, its highest rating.