Archive for the ‘Bankruptcy and the Economy’ Category

Personal Finance Taking a Hit as Banks Close in Poorer Areas

Monday, February 28th, 2011

A recent report from the New York Times highlights a troubling change in the banking industry: according to the Times, banks across the country have taken to closing branches in middle- and low-income neighborhoods even as they maintained or opened new branches in wealthier areas.

Personal finance experts of all stripes are understandably upset about the shift – fewer available banks could have disastrous consequences for the financial health of families in affected areas.

The High Cost of Being “Unbanked”

Here’s a look at some of the potential ramifications closing banks in poorer areas.

  • Increased reliance on payday lenders and check cashers: Without nearby bank branches, families in effected communities will be pushed to rely for their financial needs on so-called “predatory” lenders such as payday loan stores, cash advance outfits and check cashers. Such organizations can contribute to a cycle of poverty by charging high interest rates and fees for their services without offering clients a vehicle for saving their money.
  • Diminished saving incentives and opportunities: Without ready access to savings accounts, people living in communities without brick-and-mortar banks have a slimmer chance at reaping the benefits of opening a savings account (including earning interest on their money). In the long term, this can make financial emergencies particularly devastating, and can lead to bankruptcy filings.
  • Damaged credit and decreased ability to get loans: One thing that a savings account does is to bolster a person’s credit rating – when lenders run a credit check, they can view the status of a potential borrower’s bank accounts. Those with accounts in good standing who have a cash cushion available to them are considered better credit risks than those without any cash reserves. This can affect interest rates a borrower pays and thus determine how expensive or inexpensive a loan is.

A Look at the Numbers

So how dramatic was the shift toward closing banks in lower-income areas in the last two years? Here’s a look at the numbers, as reported in the Times:

  • More closings than openings: 2010 reportedly marked the first year in a decade and a half that more banks closed their doors in the U.S. than opened them.
  • Number of closings: In 2009, the country boasted 99,550 bank branches; last year, that number had fallen to 98,517 branches, nearly a 1,000-branch drop.
  • Number of unbanked Americans: It seems that as many as 30 million Americans rely primarily or in part on “non-traditional” financial institutions like check cashers and payday lenders – that’s about 10 percent of the country.
  • Big banks participating: While some smaller banks reportedly closed branches as part of consolidation moves to survive serious debt, it seems that Bank of America also closed 25 branches in communities with moderate income levels and opened 14 in richer places.

So why is this happening? On proposed reason is that the Community Reinvestment Act, meant to improve financial opportunities in poorer areas, is being insufficiently enforced.

Checking in on the Credit CARD Act

Wednesday, February 23rd, 2011

A recent report from the Center for Responsible Lending suggests that the reforms introduced by the Credit CARD Act of 2009 are working to improve transparency in the marketing of credit cards to consumers.

In case you need a refresher course, the Credit Card Accountability Responsibility and Disclosure Act was designed to improve transparency from banks and other credit card issuers so that consumers could navigate the world of credit with greater ease and less financial distress. Here’s a look at just how much this consumer protection legislation has changed.

  • Advertised credit card interest rates: Before the passage of the Credit CARD Act, the CRL reports, the discrepancy between the rates advertised by credit card offers and those that consumers actually paid had reached unprecedented highs. In fact, according to the report, between 2004 and 2008, the difference between promoted rates and real rates was at its greatest ever.
  • Higher advertised rates means more honesty: Since the passage of the CARD Act, it seems, credit card offers have come branded with higher (and closer to actual) advertised interest rates.
  • More transparency in pricing: According to the CRL, new rules governing the way credit cards can advertise their interest rates has led to the exposure of as much as $12.1 billion in annual fees. In other words, credit card companies are now presenting more honest pictures of how much their products cost consumers.
  • Interest rates on credit cards constant: Despite the increases in advertised interest rates, the report shows, consumers have not actually paid more in interest since the passage of the CARD Act. This suggests that, rather than increasing the cost of credit card products, the new laws simply made those costs more readily apparent to consumers.
  • Credit card offers constant: The CRL notes in its report that direct-mail offers of credit products have been extended at a volume “consistent with economic conditions,” suggesting that, while the overall total may have fallen since boom times, the drop-off can be attributed to the tight economy and not to restrictions imposed by the new law.

What Does Better Transparency Mean for You?

As a consumer, how can you expect to benefit from the changes that have been spurred by the passage of the Credit CARD Act? The CRL lists a few ways:

  • Better transparency means more competition: According to the CRL, improved transparency among credit card issuers will spur positive competition – as banks abandon the trends of hidden fees and deceptive pricing, more banks and lenders should follow suit, which should eventually translate to lower consumer costs.
  • Tighter rules do not mean less available credit: Though some critics of the CARD Act suggested that the restrictions on lending and increased disclosure requirements would mean a decrease in overall credit availability, numbers from actual research have not borne out those predictions.

The Changing Face of Mortgage Loans

Monday, February 21st, 2011

Since the start of the mortgage foreclosure crisis in 2007, the mortgage industry in the U.S. has changed significantly. And, according to a recent piece in the Wall Street Journal, one of the latest changes being noted is a push by banks for larger down payments on mortgage loans.

Here’s a look at what that might mean for potential homeowners, the housing market and the recovery of the U.S. economy.

More Money Down = Fewer People Buying Homes?

The WSJ reports on how the home-buying landscape has changed in recent years:

  • Down payments at all-time high: One online real estate information base, Zillow.com, has apparently been keeping track of median down payments required by lenders since 1997, and this year’s median (22 percent of the home’s value) is the highest that number has been since the tracking began.
  • Steep rise in required down payments: What’s more, sources report, that 22 percent figure marks a doubling of the median down payment required just three years ago! In other words, banks have reacted swiftly and decisively to the turmoil in the housing market.
  • Higher stakes for homeowners: It seems that the push for higher down payments has been largely driven by lenders, as a reaction to findings that homeowners with more of their money on the line (i.e. those who make larger down payments up front) are less likely to default on payments or go into foreclosure than those with less money at stake.
  • Alternative lending assistance sought: The Journal notes that, because many potential homebuyers cannot afford a 22 percent down payment, there’s been an uptick in applications for mortgage assistance programs designed to help select groups of people (including veterans).

A More Realistic Picture of Homeownership?

While owning a home has long been considered part of the “American Dream,” the real estate bubble’s devastating effects on the housing market has left some people questioning whether homeownership is in fact for everyone.

Considered from a broad perspective, tightened mortgage regulations could well be a good thing for the U.S. economy as a whole: with lending practices that require more fiscally conservative borrowing and spending, the housing market will have less of a chance to spiral out of control and create another boom-and-bust cycle like the one we’re currently digging out of.

Worried about Your Mortgage?

If you’re currently saddled with an unaffordable mortgage (or one that’s gotten out of your reach because of job loss or reduction), you may be able to benefit from the foreclosure-prevention power of Chapter 13 bankruptcy, which may allow you to catch up on your mortgage payments or sort out your living arrangements without the pressure of creditors breathing down your neck.

A Look at Consumer Debt Where You Live

Tuesday, February 15th, 2011

Though the U.S. economy is certainly not in top health just yet, a number of indicators suggest that we may be pulling out of this recession – but that may be a mixed blessing for many consumers.

Two recent reports (one from the Federal Reserve and one from CareOne Services) suggest that Americans have started spending more, which may be good for the economy overall, but could be a bad thing for individual debt loads.

Consumer Debt, State by State

The CareOne Services report examined 135,000 people across the country who were active in some sort of debt management program in 2009 or 2010 and found that, among that group, the average debt load was more than $10,000 in every state.

Here’s a look at the top of the heap for unsecured debt in the U.S.:

  • Delaware: Average consumer debt is $20,233, spread over seven creditors.
  • Rhode Island: Average consumer debt is $20,130, spread over seven creditors.
  • Maine: Average consumer debt is $19,454, spread over six creditors.
  • Alaska: Average consumer debt is $19,225, spread over six creditors.
  • Colorado: Average consumer debt is $18,811, spread over six creditors.
  • South Dakota: Average consumer debt is $18,707, spread over seven creditors.
  • North Carolina: Average consumer debt is $18,536, spread over six creditors.
  • Connecticut: Average consumer debt is $17,334, spread over six creditors.
  • Wisconsin: Average consumer debt is $16,903, spread over five creditors.
  • Alabama: Average consumer debt is $16,591, spread over seven creditors.

The ten states that had the lowest debt totals for those seeking debt settlement or debt management services are:

  • California: Average consumer debt is $12,801, to five creditors.
  • Michigan: Average consumer debt is $13,328, to five creditors.
  • Mississippi: Average consumer debt is $13,512, to six creditors.
  • Vermont: Average consumer debt is $13,707, to five creditors.
  • Missouri: Average consumer debt is $13,737, to six creditors.
  • Indiana: Average consumer debt is $13,945, to five creditors.
  • Kentucky: Average consumer debt is $14,028, to six creditors.
  • Iowa: Average consumer debt is $14,099, to five creditors.
  • Virginia: Average consumer debt is $14,194, to five creditors.
  • Tennessee: Average consumer debt is $14,222, to six creditors.

Increased Spending, Increased Debt, Increasing Need for Debt Relief?

During the holiday season, many economists seemed cheered by the increases in consumer spending, but personal finance advocates may find the same numbers troubling. The Fed’s report shows that our nation’s revolving debt (which basically means credit card debt) rose by 3.5 percent in December of last year.

Further, though our total amount of revolving debt apparently dropped in 2010, it dropped by a smaller amount than in 2009. This could mean that people are optimistic about the job market and the economy in general, but it could also mean they’re turning to their credit cards for necessities they can no longer afford thanks to rising prices or decreased income - and risk taking on more debt than they can handle and heading towards bankruptcy.

The Latest on the Foreclosure Crisis

Wednesday, February 9th, 2011

Since the housing boom of the early 2000s, the housing picture in the U.S. has changed dramatically, as anyone struggling to make mortgage payments each month already knows. But exactly what is the state of mortgages and foreclosures right now in the country? Here’s a look at some indicators that say a lot.

Lowest Homeownership Rate In More than a Decade

Recent data released by the Census Bureau (and reported at Credit.com) show that home ownership in the United States has dipped to its lowest level since 1998:

  • In the fourth quarter of 2010, 66.5 percent of Americans reported owning their own home.
  • In 2009, 67.2 percent of the nation claimed homeowner status; the drop reflects the continued effects of the recession on income and ability to make mortgage payments.
  • At its peak in 2004, as many as 69.2 percent of Americans reported owning a home.

Just as subprime loans were found to disproportionately affect non-white home buyers, it seems that foreclosure rates are currently higher among that segment of the population: in 2007, the number of African Americans that owned a home was reported at 48 percent; a year later, the number had already fallen to 44.8 percent. Similarly, among Hispanic families, 50 percent reported homeownership in 2007, but only 46.8 percent did in the last quarter of 2010.

Perhaps the most troubling aspect of these numbers is their apparent explanation: while the first wave of foreclosures resulted largely from the resetting of subprime loans, this wave seems to be more a result of long-term job loss hindering homeowners’ ability to make their (otherwise affordable) mortgage payments.

Homeowners on their Own to Fight Foreclosure?

In a related story, The New York Times recently reported that, more and more, Americans are having to fight the foreclosure of their homes without legal representation or outside help. According to the article, areas of the country with high foreclosure rates are holding how-to workshops for individuals and couples interested in contesting foreclosure in the courts.

New reports apparently show that foreclosure is shifting its face in the court system: what was once a process that involved mostly paperwork now, it seems, involves more and more people actually visiting the court to make their case for keeping their homes.

How Can I Fight Foreclosure?

Whether you’re struggling from job loss, job reduction or an unaffordable mortgage loan, you may be able to fight foreclosure with the help of a Chapter 13 bankruptcy filing. Thanks to its three- to five-year repayment plan, Chapter 13 helps many homeowners catch up on their mortgage payments by rearranging the amount and type of debt they’re responsible for paying each month.

2011 may Be a Record Year for Foreclosures

Monday, January 17th, 2011

Much has been written in the last few years about the foreclosure crisis that took hold once the housing bubble burst. And, according to the Associated Press, this year will not offer any relief – in fact, sources suggest, 2011 looks like it could see even more foreclosures than 2010 did.

1.2 Million Foreclosures Predicted for 2011

So why are news outlets and industry insiders predicting that 2011 will have more mortgage foreclosures than any year we’ve seen? A number of factors are apparently contributing:

  • High unemployment: While the national unemployment rate has declined slightly since its peak of just above 10 percent, it’s still much higher than normal and millions of Americans without work are or will soon be unable to keep up with their mortgage payments.
  • Plunging home values: Further, the crash of the housing market means that millions of homeowners are currently “under water” on their mortgages – in other words, they owe more than the home’s value and so have little incentive to pay their loans back.
  • Delayed foreclosures last year: Another spur for 2011’s foreclosure season is the delays in foreclosure processing that happened at the end of last year: in addition to ordinary holiday moratoria on foreclosure proceedings, the robo-signing scandal halted foreclosures on many properties around the country. Those foreclosures that were delayed may now proceed normally.

A Look at the Numbers

So just how bad is the foreclosure crisis expected to get this year? The numbers provided by news outlets paint a pretty bleak picture:

  • A reported five million borrowers are currently behind on payments by at least two months; without serious change in the employment scene, that number is likely to increase.
  • It seems that as many as 2.9 million (that’s one in every 45) U.S. houses were in some stage of the foreclosure process last year. This could mean that the homeowners simply received notice of default or that the foreclosure actually took place.
  • Apparently, five states are responsible for the bulk of foreclosures around the country, and insiders expect the pain to worsen in these areas: California, Arizona, Florida, Michigan and Illinois have reportedly accounted for about 1.5 million of the foreclosure notices received last year.

An End in Sight?

One source quoted in the Associated Press article seems to think that 2011 will show the “peak” of foreclosure filings in the U.S., which could be taken for either a good sign or a bad sign – 2009 and 2010 both set records for foreclosure volume.

And is there any hope if your home is nearing foreclosure? You may still be able to benefit from the protection of Chapter 13 bankruptcy (ask a lawyer for details), or perhaps from lowered mortgage rates. But many banks, it seems, are still less than eager to offer refinancing deals.

Foreclosures Expected to Balloon this Month

Monday, January 10th, 2011

Recent news reports have forecasted a significant increase in the rate of mortgage foreclosures across the country in the first month of 2011. According to National Public Radio, the forces that held foreclosures in check for the final months of 2010 are no longer at play and this year should see foreclosures picking up with a vengeance.

Here’s a look at what’s happened so far in the foreclosure world and what you can expect in coming months.

The Sad Saga of U.S. Home Foreclosures

While many economic indicators suggest that we’re finally tugging ourselves out of the recession that’s gripped us for years now, the state of the housing market suggests otherwise. Here’s a look at why.

  • Robo-signing foreclosure scandal: In the last few months of 2010, a foreclosure scandal hit: it seems that, at many banks, the practice of “robo-signing” had become common for foreclosure paperwork. Lawyers questioned the legality of the practice and, in the meantime, hundreds of thousands of foreclosures were put on hold while the courts decided what to do.
  • End-of-year foreclosure stays: Following that scandal came the holidays, a time during which many banks and lenders traditionally put a hold on foreclosure processing.
  • Backlog of foreclosures in 2011: Now, of course, the holidays are over and the robo-signing cases have been more or less settled. And, according to NPR, as many as 100,000 homes could go into foreclosure by the end of January.
  • Even more homes on the market: Naturally, increased foreclosures are bad news for the families directly affected by them, but they’re also likely to be problematic for the already glutted housing market. And, with mortgage lending standards tightened and unemployment still above nine percent, the chances of other families buying those homes any time soon are slim.

Is there Any Hope for Foreclosure Relief?

If you’re worried about losing your home to foreclosure, now is the time to take action. Consider the following.

  • Visit a housing counselor: She can help you figure out what your options are and whether you can realistically catch up on your mortgage and stay in your home.
  • Speak with a lawyer: An attorney can help you figure out whether or not Chapter 13 bankruptcy could provide you with sufficient means to halt foreclosure and work towards saving your home.
  • Consider rescission: Ask your lawyer about the right of rescission, which could help you keep your home if your lender originated the initial loan fraudulently.
  • Contact your lender: Whatever you decide to do, be sure to keep lines of communication between you and your lender open. While mortgage modifications may not always be an option, they can provide a realistic alternative when they’re practical.

Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection Overseer Named

Monday, December 20th, 2010

The New York Times reported last week that the newly created Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection now has an overseer of enforcement. Richard Cordray, former attorney general of Ohio, was reportedly hired to the post by presidential appointee Elizabeth Warren, who is currently in charge of the bureau.

So what will Mr. Cordray’s responsibilities be in the new post? According to the Times, he’ll be focused on overseeing enforcement actions for a variety of consumer-related financial issues, including the following:

  • Foreclosure fraud: Recent financial news like the robo-signing scandal and other questionable foreclosure practices would fall under Mr. Cordray’s purview, it seems. And, as sources note, he ought to be prepared to fight against such questionable bank behavior, since his position as Ohio’s AG included fighting certain kinds of foreclosure fraud.
  • Abusive payday lenders: As many debt-laden Americans know, payday lenders can charge outlandish fees and interest rates and lead ordinary consumers into a crippling cycle of debt. As part of his position in the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, Mr. Cordray would be responsible for making sure that regulations and laws for payday lenders are sufficient, followed and enforced.
  • Questionable bank behavior: On a grander scale, Cordray’s responsibilities may reach as far as making sure larger financial entities like banks and other lenders follow laws designed to keep them from engaging in the sort of risky, fast-and-loose behavior that led to the crash of the housing market and touched off the current recession.

Cordray’s Past Consumer Protection Actions

So how did Cordray get the job? It seems his résumé includes a variety of consumer-friendly moves, including:

  • Lawsuits against big financial firms: The Times reports that Cordray managed to squeeze $2 billion from major names in the finance world, including American International Group (AIG), Merril Lynch and Marsh & McLennan.
  • Bold strikes at government overseers: Another notch on Cordray’s belt, the Times notes, is that he called out the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for falling down on the job and thus enabling many of the abuses in the finance world that led to our current financial mess.

Role of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau

Many consumer advocates lauded the creation of the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, which was outlined in the financial overhaul bill passed early in Obama’s tenure as president. When it is fully up and running, the bureau, headed by former Harvard bankruptcy professor Elizabeth Warren, will be responsible for making sure consumer interests are taken into consideration when lawmakers consider regulatory changes for financial and other matters.

Students & Parents Need Financial Literacy Lessons

Tuesday, November 9th, 2010

Hard economic times (like the ones we’re in) tend to remind us of how important understanding financial matters can be. After all, everyday transactions and financial decisions are what pave the way to larger financial events like being able to purchase a home or requiring the debt help offered by bankruptcy.

But, according to a recent report from Credit.com, fewer than half of the nation’s high school students were able to earn passing grades on a test of the basic tenets of financial literacy. And, according to another Credit.com story, many American parents are similarly befuddled by money matters.

What Your Kids Need to Know about Money

According to Credit.com, financial literacy lessons are best given and demonstrated in the home. Here are some finance basics to consider:

  • Debt starts early: Sources note that the average college student leaves school with about $4,000 in credit card debt and $20,000 in student loans – that’s a pretty big hole to be in, especially in this economy, when jobs are difficult to find. Further, reports indicate that bankruptcy filings are increasing most rapidly among citizens aged 18 and 25.
  • Money affects the whole family: It seems that as many as half of all college graduates are now moving in with their parents after leaving school because of an inability to find work or afford alternate housing. This can put a financial strain on parents, especially those who are already having difficulty making ends meet.
  • Talking is important: It’s unfortunate that money is often a taboo subject in this country, because discussing finance issues in an open, frank manner may be the best way to make sure everyone is on the same page financially. Credit.com reports that 85 percent of teenagers are worried about money – in many cases, speaking with teens about a household’s finances might relieve some of their stress.
  • It’s okay to be confused…if you seek help: One study suggests that a mere five percent of American parents were able to name the main factors that affect a person’s credit score, which means that if you’re not sure where to begin teaching your kids about money, you’re not alone. The good news is that there are plenty of educational resources available for free online, which means you and your family don’t have to be in the dark much longer.

Start Your Kids on a Path to Financial Success

If you don’t talk with your kids about money, now might be the time to start. Consider addressing some of the following:

  • How much things cost: If you’re paying all your kids’ expenses, they probably don’t understand the dollar value attached to each item.
  • How much people make: While you may not be comfortable revealing your salary to your children, you can discuss minimum wage, typical salaries for various professions, and how much time a person must spend working.
  • How credit cards work: Kids probably don’t ever see a credit card bill – only the magic of using plastic in a store. So teach them about interest rates and monthly payments.
  • Allowance: If you don’t already give your kids an allowance, it might be a good tool to teach them how to handle money.

Foreclosure News: Record Repossessions and the Scandal

Monday, October 25th, 2010

Since news of the so-called “robo-signer” scandal broke a few weeks ago, a lot has happened in the foreclosure business in this country. Here’s a look at some of the latest developments and what they might mean for individual homeowners and the nation’s housing market.

Record Number of Home Seizures

Bloomberg news reports that mortgage foreclosures in the United States reached record high levels in September, just before the robo-signing story pushed many mortgage lenders to pause their home repossessions. Here are some details (before you read on, we want you know that Chapter 13 bankruptcy is designed to stop foreclosure and repossession. Ok, that's it. Have fun reading on!):

  • More than 100,000 homes foreclosed: In September alone, according to figures from RealtyTrac, lenders repossessed 102,134 U.S. properties. This figure apparently represents the highest monthly total ever recorded (going back to 2005). The previous high came a month earlier, in August of this year.
  • Foreclosure filings at record high: In addition to actual lender repossessions, other steps in the foreclosure process (including notices of default and auction) reportedly occurred at high levels last month: 347,420 total foreclosure notices, which means that one in every 371 U.S. homes was in some stage of foreclosure.
  • Sales of foreclosure properties high: While the record foreclosure levels aren’t exactly good news, there seems to be a small bright spot: Bloomberg notes that one-third of all home sales in the U.S. in September were sales of foreclosed properties, meaning that at least people are buying houses again.
  • National foreclosures halted: Of course, Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Ally Financial Inc., three major mortgage lenders, have paused foreclosure proceedings in some or all of the country to address the legal issues raised by the alleged improprieties of robo-signers. While a pause to foreclosures might be good news for families in danger of losing their homes, it could have a negative impact on home sales.

Will You Have to Pay Your Legal Fees?

The New York Times reported this week on a new state law in New York that will require lenders to pay the legal fees of homeowners who triumph in foreclosure proceedings. Here’s the scoop:

  • Not a national law: While the law currently only applies to New York residents, it may gain popularity elsewhere, depending on the effect it has on foreclosure cases there.
  • Correcting an imbalance: Currently, in most states, mortgage lenders apparently include a provision in loan papers that requires borrowers to pay lenders’ legal fees in the event of foreclosure.
  • A better shot for homeowners: With the potential of higher payments (because lenders tend to have more capital than individuals facing foreclosure), consumers looking to fight foreclosure cases may have an easier time getting lawyers to take on their cases and thus fare better in court.

Considering the hubbub in the news concerning foreclosure right now, it will likely be an interesting few months or years to see if and how the foreclosure process changes in the United States.