Archive for the ‘Georgia Bankruptcy’ Category
Monday, June 6th, 2011
Yesterday, my son graduated from high school. His class selected a math/environmental sciences teacher named Nicole Brite to deliver the faculty address to the senior class. Ms. Brite delivered a spectacular address which was meaningful, witty and thoughtful (and she received a well deserved standing ovation from both the students and the audience).
In one part of her speech, Ms. Brite turned to the graduates and said "now I am going to offer you some words of advice that I wish someone had said to me when I was leaving high school." One of the points she made I think is applicable to everyone, not just high school students.
"Stay away from credit cards," said Ms. Brite. "When you get to college, you will see tents set up by the credit card companies. They will offer you frisbees and t-shirts and free food to entice you to sign up for a credit card. They'll tell you that a credit card will help you build up your credit and you can use it only for emergencies. Don't believe it. You will be tempted to decide that an emergency takes the form of a pizza at 2 in the morning, or putting your entire fraternity's dinner on your card because no one has cash. Credit cards will mess you up."
I hope that each and every one of the graduates in my son's class heard these words of wisdom and I wish this advice could be included in the "welcome to school" packets given to incoming freshman.
Over the years I see dozens of young adults in their late 20's and early 30's who are still dealing with thousands of dollars of college years credit card debt and the associated damaged credit ratings. It is so easy to find oneself behind the proverbial eight ball, and digging out from a credit hole is a lot more difficult than avoiding the problem in the first place.
If your son or daughter recently graduated from high school, congratulations on an accomplishment and a milestone. Let your graduate know that while college isn't exactly the real world, they now have assumed the capacity to get themselves in adult level financial trouble. As uninteresting as household budgeting ten years hence may seem, they most definitely do not want their college aged mistakes to lead them to a bankruptcy lawyer's office in the future.
Posted in Advice, Consumer Protection, General consumer bankruptcy info, Georgia Bankruptcy, a, address, aged, and, applicable, brite, class, class , college, credit cards for college students, dangers of credit cards, delivered, financial advice for high school graduates, graduated, graduates, high, leaving, math environmental, mistakes, ms, named, nicole, said , school, sciences, selected, senior, spectacular, students, teacher, the, wisdom, words, years | Comments Off
Sunday, February 27th, 2011
Earlier this month on my Atlanta-bankruptcy web site blog I discussed an interesting case involving mortgage loan deficiency claims that was issued by the Georgia Court of Appeals and Georgia Supreme Court. In the River Farm vs. Suntrust case, the Georgia courts ruled that a mortgage lender could sue a defaulted borrower on the promissory note and thereby bypass the deficiency confirmation process associated with a foreclosure. This ruling is important because property values in Georgia have been trending downward and more and more often I am seeing cases where the balance due on a mortgage exceeds the fair market value of my client's home.
This court case should be of concern to you if you intend to walk away from your home because you are delinquent or if your are so "underwater" with your mortgage that it does not make sense to fight to keep a home that may never be worth what is owed on it. If you do walk away (without filing bankruptcy), your lender may sue you on the mortgage loan contract instead of foreclosing. The lender would refrain from foreclosing to avoid a legal requirement associated with foreclosure that would require the lender to appear before a judge to argue that the foreclosure sale price was reasonable.
In my article, I pointed out that this change in the law might encourage more people to file bankruptcies since a bankruptcy can discharge any deficiency claim.
However, there is another potential problem area that could arise if your lender holds off on foreclosing. This problem area relates to homeowners' association (HOA) dues.
Under Georgia law, homeowners' associations enjoy special protections. Unpaid dues can automatically can become liens that encumber your property. As HOA lawyers read the law, if you file a bankruptcy and surrender your home, your delinquent HOA dues as of the date of filing will be discharged. However, ongoing dues that accrue after the filing remain your obligation until title passes. In other words, if your HOA dues are $100 per month and you file Chapter 7 bankruptcy on February 28, your dues begin accruing again on March 1. If your lender does not foreclose until November, you would, in theory, be responsible for 8 months of dues, or $800, after your filing, even though you have stated your intention to surrender your house in bankruptcy.
Obviously, a provision of the law that involuntarily re-obligates you to hundreds or thousands of dollars of monthly dues on an asset you have surrendered seems contrary to the public policy associated with bankruptcy. Nevertheless, this is how lawyers for homeowners' associations read the law.
I discussed this issue with an attorney at a law firm that represents HOA's in the Atlanta area and throughout Georgia. This lawyer offered the above explanation of the law but he said that as a practical matter, his firm has not and does not plan to sue a homeowner for HOA dues that arise after a bankruptcy case has been filed, as long as the homeowner vacates the premises. However, the homeowner is presumably fair game if he remains in the house (or rents it out) while the bank is dilly-dallying about foreclosing.
He also advised me that his firm does not report post-petition HOA delinquencies to credit bureaus.
The problem here, of course, is that the HOA lawyer's explanation of policy is just that – a voluntary policy. Is it possible that this HOA law firm or one like it could change its policy? Is it possible that the HOA itself might sell this receivable to a debt buyer who would not hesitate to sue you?
I would not assume that an HOA or a debt buyer will necessarily write off otherwise collectible debt, but until this issue is litigated in a Georgia court, we will not know the answer to this issue. I do think that a homeowner who remains in a house after surrendering that house in a bankruptcy will face an increased likelihood of an HOA lawsuit. I will also continue my practice of rejected the HOA contract as part of my bankruptcy filings.
Posted in Foreclosure issues, Georgia Bankruptcy, Mortgage, Repossession issues, accruing, an, area, associations, case, claims, deficiency, delinquent, dilly dallying, discussed, dues, enjoy, foreclosing he, foreclosing , hoa, homeowners, homeowners association lawsuits, interesting, involving, law i, loan, month, mortgage deficiency claims, ongoing, problem, protections , read, relates, special, the, unpaid | Comments Off
Sunday, October 3rd, 2010
Most of the clients who I represent in Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 cases view bankruptcy as their absolute last resort. Usually, by the time they get to me, these clients have exhausted every other alternative – they have borrowed money from relatives and friends, sold possessions on eBay and cashed out or borrowed against retirement plans.
All of these choices, by the way, create unintended consequences – if you are reaching that point of desperation where you are thinking about selling things, cashing out retirement plans, etc., I would rather that you call me before taking any action because of the risk that you might unknowingly lose some of the benefit from your bankruptcy filing, or possibly disqualify yourself altogether.
Retirement plan loans such as 401(k) loans create a variety of issues and are almost always a bad idea in a bankruptcy context. Presumably you borrow against your 401(k) because you need cash now, you expect to repay that loan in the near term, you want to preserve your 401(k) account for the future, and because you do not want the tax consequences associated with cashing out your 401(k).
Bankruptcy trustees, however, look at 401(k) loans in a different light. They see any allocation to repay a 401(k) loan (and sometimes any ongoing contribution to a 401(k) plan) as an unnecessary reduction of disposable income that would otherwise be available to pay creditors. 401(k) loan payments cannot be counted as allowable deductions in your means test calculations. And both Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 trustees and/or creditors will often object if you include a 401(k) loan repayment allocation in your Schedule I and J budget in either a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13.
Since 401(k) plan funds are generally considered "exempt" or sheltered property in a Georgia Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, your best choice often means not using your 401(k) as a last gasp source of cash.
401(k) loans and on-going 401(k) contributions do not make bankruptcy impossible, but they do complicate matters. If you are in financial trouble and are thinking about raiding your 401(k) or retirement plan but have not done so, you should not take any action until you have spoken to a bankruptcy lawyer. If you have already cashed out or borrowed against your 401(k), make sure that your attorney is aware of this fact.
Posted in 401 k, 401(k) loans in bankruptcy, Bankruptcy budgets, Consequences, General consumer bankruptcy info, Georgia Bankruptcy, Loans, Retirement, Trustee objections in Chapter 13, allocation, allowable, altogether retirement, borrowed, cashed, cashing, counted, create, deductions, loan, plan, plans, plans all, repayment, trustee objections, unintended | Comments Off
Sunday, September 19th, 2010
If you have been reading your local newspapers, you may be aware that Nathan Deal, the Republican candidate for Governor of Georgia, is facing scrutiny about his personal finances and about the bankruptcy filings of his daughter and son-in-law.
According to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution, Mr. Deal personally guaranteed bank loans totaling over $2 million that was used to build and finance a sporting goods store owned by his daughter and son-in-law called Wilder Outdoors, located on Highway 365 near Gainesville. Unfortunately for the Wilders, the sporting goods business failed, leaving about $2.5 million due. Mr. and Mrs. Wilder filed Chapter 7 bankruptcy in 2009, discharging their obligations on the outstanding bank loans, leaving Mr. Deal exposed as the guarantor.
Mr. Deal and the Wilders were able to refinance the business loan several years ago prior to the closing of the business but now, a $2.5 million debt will come due in February, which would be about a month after he takes office if he wins.
Mr. Deal asserts that his financial quandary is no different from that faced by many parents who offered financial support to the entrepreneurial dreams of their children. He has put his primary residence and other property on the market and no doubt hopes to generate enough cash to satisfy the bank's demands. You can read more about the Wilder bankruptcy issues on my Bankruptcy Law Network post about this situation.
Democrats are pointing to Mr. Deal's financial troubles as proof of his questionable judgment, especially since it turns out that Mr. Deal's son-in-law, Clint Wilder, appears to have been ineligible to file Chapter 7 in July, 2009. Mr. Wilder had filed an individual Chapter 7 case in Atlanta back in December, 2001. Section 727(a)(8) of the Bankruptcy Code provides that a debtor must wait at least eight (8) years from the time a Chapter 7 case is filed before filing a second Chapter 7 – here the time period between the two filings was about 7 1/2 years.
Although the Wilders' case was closed in December, 2009, the United States trustee has the right to reopen this case and petition the judge to revoke the discharge. From what I am hearing, this is what is happening now.
Candidate Deal correctly points out that issues relating to his son-in-law's bankruptcy are not his doings and should not be attributed to him. On the other hand, the Deal campaign has to be concerned about the prospect of a candidate who could very well be insolvent the month after he takes office and who could face the prospect of filing a voluntary petition or having an involuntary bankruptcy file against him shortly after he takes office. You may recall that former State school superintendent Kathy Cox chose not to run for re-election after she and her husband filed Chapter 7 following her husband's failed business deals.
I think that the main lesson to glean from this situation has to do with the inherent problems associated with co-signing a loan for anybody, especially when the money put at risk is more than you can afford to lose.
What do you think? Will Mr. Deal's looming financial problems cost him your vote? Or do his financial problems give him insight into the economic plight of struggling Georgians?
Posted in 2, 2009 , Business, Chapter 7 issues, Finance, Georgia Bankruptcy, Involuntary Bankruptcy, Loans, Nathan Deal, Revocation of Discharge-Section 727, a, and, bank, build, called, chose, correctly, cox, daughter, deal, failed, goods, guaranteed, guarantor mr, happening, hearing, ineligible to file Chapter 7, july, kathy, mr, now candidate, outdoors, owned, personally, points, recall, revocation of Chapter 7 discharge, school, son in law, sporting, state, store, superintendent, the, totaling, wilder, wilders | Comments Off
Tuesday, September 14th, 2010
There are dozens of lawyers out there who offer to prepare and file bankruptcy cases. Some work in high volume "bankruptcy mill" firms that compete on price while others compete on experience, knowledge and service. Usually the cost differential is a few hundred dollars, but when you are considering bankruptcy, every dollar counts – so why would you want a lawyer like me as opposed to a firm that would offer to represent you for a lower price?
I could offer a glib answer like "if you needed brain surgery, would you look for the cheapest surgeon on the one with the most experience and industry recognition" but that does not really answer the question. Perhaps it would be helpful if you could look over my shoulder as I analyze a real life situation that came before me recently.
Earlier this month an email arrived from a couple who wanted information about bankruptcy. The wife wrote that she was a stay at home mom raising 2 children and that her husband lost his job about a year ago, and recently started back to work at a lower paying job. Their current household income is just under $50,000. They own a house that is now worth less than what they paid for it – the house is worth about $200,000 – the first mortgage is $210,000 and the second mortgage is $35,000. They own one older car outright and are financing a mini-van. They have also incurred around $25,000 of credit card debt – most of which was used trying to keep the mortgage current.
Earlier this year they fell behind on both the first and second mortgage. The first mortgage lender started foreclosure proceedings, but suspended foreclosure and offered to consider my potential clients for a mortgage modification. They have been making modified payments for several months but when they called the lender to ask if they had been approved for a permanent modification, the account rep told them that their modification paperwork had not been approved but that their application had been sent to another department for a reconsideration. News of this decision had not been provided to my prospective clients – the only reason they found out was from their call. No one from the mysterious reconsideration division was available and their multiple calls have not been returned for over 2 weeks.
They decided to contact me because they are getting the sense that the mortgage company is unlikely to approve their modification and they want to be prepared for a possible foreclosure. What are their options?
Here is what I advised them through my conversation with the wife:
First, I asked what was their desire regarding the house – was keeping the house a priority? The wife responded that they would like to keep their house but they were not sure they could afford it given the husband's reduced salary.
I explained that Chapter 13 is the type of bankruptcy that can stop a foreclosure but that Chapter 13 would not allow us to change the amount of the monthly payments, nor would it change the total balance due on the mortgage. Chapter 13 would allow them to "cure" their arrearage by paying that arrearage (the past due payments) over a five year period of time, along with other debts that would also be included in the Chapter 13 payment plan. However, if they were not able to afford the regular monthly payments Chapter 13 probably did not make much sense.
The only possible justification for a Chapter 13 would arise from the possibility that they could use Chapter 13 to "strip" the second mortgage and make that unsecured. Under Chapter 13 law, a second mortgage that is wholly unsecured, meaning that the balance due the first mortgage exceeds the fair market value of the home. If the second mortgage is wholly unsecured, we can file a motion to strip the lien, thereby making the second mortgage debt an unsecured claim in the Chapter 13. If our Chapter 13 plan called for paying unsecured debt at 5 cents on the dollar, then Chapter 13 might be something to consider.
In this case, the wife advised me that the monthly payment due the first lender was more than what they could afford, plus she did not seem enthusiastic about signing on for a five year payment plan, so we decided to remove Chapter 13 from consideration.
We then proceeded to discuss Chapter 7.
I pointed out that Chapter 7 would allow the couple to discharge their credit card debt as well as any potential liability arising from the surrender of their home. I felt that the real danger came from the second mortgage lender as it has been my experience that first lenders rarely pursue deficiency claims because of the Georgia law that requires them to go to court to certify the deficiency before a judge within 30 days of the foreclosure. Second mortgage holders, by contrast, need only file suit on the promissory note associated with their loans. I see far more deficiency balance claims from second mortgage lenders than from first mortgage lenders.
I also noted that since the foreclosure process could take several months, one strategy here would be to remain in the house and pay nothing – nothing to either mortgage lender and nothing to the credit card lenders. This strategy would allow my prospective clients to reduce their budget outflow dramatically for several months while they built up a small cash reserve, and then file bankruptcy in four to six months when creditors were starting to take action. I noted that this strategy was based on economics, and that they would have to be comfortable with the moral implications of this course of action. I also noted that this "wait until the last minute" strategy would cause significant damage to their credit in addition to the bankruptcy. By contrast, filing a Chapter 7 when there were few or no 120 day late references would make recovery from bankruptcy a little easier. Credit reports document payment histories and while a bankruptcy discharge will put the balances at zero, it does not delete the negative payment histories.
On the other hand, I advised the wife that if she and her husband waited to file and the husband secured a better, higher paying job, their household income might leave them with disposable income in their budget, or it might cause their household income to exceed the median income for a family of four, thereby making Chapter 7 much more difficult or impossible. It has been my experience that when household income exceeds the median (in Georgia the current median income for a family of 4 is $68,258) by $10,000 or more, it can be very difficult to qualify for Chapter 7 under the means test. Thus, if the husband was actively looking for employment and his target income was $80,000 or more, waiting to file Chapter 7 might not be the best idea.
The wife then asked me about the credit report issue – how long would it take for she and her husband to rebuild their credit. I responded by saying that it my experience, a Chapter 7 debtor can expect his credit score to remain depressed for eight months to a year following the Chapter 7 discharge. However, Chapter 7 has the positive effect of eliminating all debt and thereby causing an improvement to the debt to income ratio. Further, individuals can only file Chapter 7 once every eight years – so from a lender's perspective a recently discharged debtor has no debt and cannot file bankruptcy for at least 8 years.
I assured the wife that I made it my practice to follow up with my clients who had received a discharge to review their credit reports three to five months after discharge. I have found that at least half of the time, there are errors on the credit reports that artificially depress post bankruptcy credit scores and sometimes, the errors are actionable, meaning that we can collect damages from creditors for Fair Debt Collection Practices Act violations. In a few cases I have been able to collect enough in damages to cover the attorney's fees and filing fees associated with the original bankruptcy filing!
I ended by conversation with the wife by thanking her for contacting me. I then followed up our conversation with a brief email summarizing what we had spoken about and providing her with the "get started" link to one of my web sites.
I hope you can see that even a "simple" fact pattern can give rise to a variety of options and pratical considerations. Consumer bankruptcy is not a "one size fits all" practice and I am able to raise all of the points that I did because I have seen a lot of different issues over the past 23 years. If you have any questions about what have written here or if you want to discuss your personal situation, I encourage you to contact attorney Susan Blum or me by phone at 770-393-4985 or send us an email.
Posted in Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Credit, Current, Foreclosure, General consumer bankruptcy info, Georgia Bankruptcy, Lenders, Mortgage, a, and, because , choosing a bankruptcy lawyer, claims, deficiency, document, easier , exceeds, georgia, histories, house, household, in, income, keeping, lender, median, payment, priority , proceedings, pursue, rarely, reports, responded, started, the, wife | Comments Off
Wednesday, June 30th, 2010
Not surprisingly, I get calls from small business owners who are contemplating personal bankruptcy when their businesses fail. There are many issues that arise in these types of cases but I would like to focus on one problem that, more than any other, can force the business owner into bankruptcy.
Generally when the owner of a small business leases retail space, the landlord will demand a personal guarantee. This means, of course, that in the event of a default, the business (which may be a corporation or LLC) faces liability and the business owner personally faces liability.
Given this reality, every small business owner should seek counsel to discussion asset protection options before starting his business, but that is a topic for another day.
If the business fails you might be surprised to learn that the landlord does not necessarily have to take any steps to "mitigate damages" by releasing the retail space. Instead, the landlord can demand payment for the full value of the lease from the business owner personally. If the business owner has a house with $100,000 of equity, that equity is therefore at risk, and given that Georgia's bankruptcy exemption statute is stingy ($10,000 for an individual or $20,000 for a married couple filing jointly), bankruptcy may not offer much protection.
I ran across two helpful resources that go into more detail about the landlord's obligations or lack thereof. The first is a blog post from Atlanta lawyer David Pardue in his Georgia Real Estate Litigation blog. In his post, David discusses a recent Georgia Court of Appeals case called Sirdah v. North Springs Assocs., LLLP, which was decided by the Court of Appeals in June, 2010. In the Sirdah case, the Court restated its previous holding that a landlord is under no duty to mitigate damages unless (1) the landlord accepts the tenant's surrender, or (2) the tenant successfully terminates the lease. In the Sirdah case, the tenant returned his keys to the landlord and argued that by accepting the keys, the landlord accepted the tenant's surrender. The Court said that accepting the keys did not constitute an acceptance of the surrender.
Another helpful resource is a more extensive article written by attorney Stephanie Everett of the Bloom Law Firm in Atlanta. In this paper, Stephanie examines the various scenarios that could arise when a tenant breaches a lease and the resulting consequences. Although Stephanie's article is written for the benefit of landlords, tenants will find the information very helpful as well.
As the law in this area could change, you should not rely on these resources in the absence of counsel. If you are a small business owner and you are coming to the realization that your business may not survive, you would be wise to consult with a lawyer to discuss your options both in business and in terms of bankruptcy. I have seen far too many business owners who simply left and discovered after the fact that their bankruptcy options were limited, or too painful.
Posted in 1, Business, David Pardue, General consumer bankruptcy info, Georgia Bankruptcy, Protected property issues, Sirdah v. North Springs Associates, a, accepted, accepts, and, appeals, assocs, breach of lease, breaches, called, case, consequences , damages, duty, faces, landlord, lease, lease , leases, liability, liability given, llc, mitigate, mitigation of damages, north, owner, personally, resulting, retail, retail lease and personal liability, sirdah, small, space, springs, successfully, tenant, terminates, the, v | Comments Off
Friday, January 22nd, 2010
According to a recent article regarding Georgia bankruptcy published in the Atlanta Journal Constitution, it is nothing new that Georgia has one of the highest bankruptcy rates in the nation. What is new, suggests the AJC article, is who is filing: large numbers of people who have not previously had problems with financial instability.
With unemployment exceeding 10 percent, a real estate market in shambles, and many laws in place which 
support creditors, Georgia has had one of the highest bankruptcy rates for years. In 2009, and even here in early 2010, the numbers of people in Georgia filing personal bankruptcy continue to increase. These increasing numbers are partially the result of the large numbers of filers who are experiencing financial instability for the first time.
Richard Thomson, a partner at the Atlanta-based bankruptcy law firm Clark & Washington, said his firm is taking on an increasing number of higher-income professionals as clients. These higher-income filers simply can’t pay for all of their assets and possessions – boats, expensive cars, etc. As a result, they are filing bankruptcy as a means to start over, and their possessions are often given up as part of the process. According to Thomson, “They’re just saying ‘Take it. It’s not worth the effort anymore. I can’t keep up with it.”
Susan Blum and I are seeing the same trends here at Ginsberg Law Offices. While our firm has regularly handled cases for formerly high earners and individuals with substantial assets, we are seeing more and more people who start our meetings by saying "I never in a million years thought I would ever end up talking to a bankruptcy lawyer…." In many cases, clients who had previously enjoyed a comfortable lifestyle wait until disaster is about to strike before calling our office, perhaps in the expectation that their situations will improve. And more and more of these clients are turning to a Chapter 7 liquidation rather than a Chapter 13 reorganization.
More Chapter 7 Cases Being Filed
According to the National Bankruptcy Research Center, over half of Georgians filing between January and November 2009 filed Chapter 7 Bankruptcy. In a Chapter 7, most debts are wiped out, but so are assets that aren’t protected by exemptions – second cars or vacation homes, for example. 47 percent filed Chapter 13 Bankruptcy, which allows consumers to hold on to a house and car but requires that they repay a portion of their debts generally over a five year period. A Chapter 13 is more or less a reorganization of debt.
These percentages are new for Georgia, which traditionally has been dominated by Chapter 13 filings, as debtors were most concerned about holding onto a house and accumulated equity. Currently, many homeowners have little equity or owe more than their houses are worth, which may be one reason for the spike in Chapter 7 filings.
According to Consumer Credit Counseling Service of Greater Atlanta, one in five consumers receiving recent pre-bankruptcy counseling said avoiding foreclosure was the primary reason for seeking bankruptcy protection. Georgia’s foreclosure process is the fastest in the nation, as it occurs without court or government supervision and takes only a week. A bankruptcy filing is the only realistic option for most Georgians seeking to delay a public auction of their homes.
I (Jonathan) have been representing individuals in Chapter 7 and Chapter 13 cases for over 20 years and I can only remember two or three times when the demand for our services was so high. The Congressional Budget Office says that the recession is over but I am not seeing any indication that this is true.
Posted in 10, Amp, Assets, Bankruptcy, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy Filings in Georgia, Filers, Foreclosure, General consumer bankruptcy info, Georgia Bankruptcy, Georgia bankruptcy rates, Law, Possessions, and, atlanta based, boats, can’t, clark, clients, exceeding, expect, experiencing, financial, firm, georgia bankruptcy filings, georgia’s, higher income, homes jack, instability, instability with, numbers, pay, percent, problems, process, protection, recent bankruptcy trends in Georgia, seeking, simply, the, unemployment, williams, – | Comments Off
Sunday, January 17th, 2010
A number of stories have recently appeared in bankruptcy and 
consumer rights blogs suggesting that the Atlanta based collection firm Mann, Bracken, LLC has gone out of business. On his Caveat Emptor blog, Minnesota bankruptcy attorney Sam Glover has written several posts about the Mann, Bracken firm including one on December 22, 2009 stating that the calls to the firm's phone number instructs callers to communicate directly with their creditors. I called several numbers listed for Mann, Bracken but the calls were answered by a message that "all circuits are busy, try your call again later."
Although based in Atlanta, Mann, Bracken has a national practice and it has apparently been growing by merging with other law firms. I found a web site called paymbw.com which purports to be a payment gateway for debtors to make electronic check or credit card payments on debts being handled by Mann, Bracken. This site notes that Mann, Bracken is the successor by merger to Wolpoff & Abramson L.L.P., and Eskanos & Adler P.C., two collection law firms well known to debtor's lawyers.
The domain mbllc.com has a "coming soon" page and the registration information for that domain is private. I looked up the contact information for the partners. Douglas Mann's shows him as an inactive lawyer affiliated with Mann, Bracken. Chris Bracken's registration shows a gmail.com email address, a business address at Mann, Bracken's location, but the space for the law firm information is blank. Two other partners – Bill Layng and Steve Knezo – are now affiliated with other law firms.
Atlanta TV station WSB sent a crew to the Mann, Bracken offices and found deserted premises along with handwritten placards stating that the firm has closed down. According to WSB, Mann, Bracken was associated with a large debt collector called Axiant, which is now in Chapter 7.
Based on all the information I can gather, the law firm of Mann, Bracken is no more. However the demise of this firm does not mean that debts owed to clients of Mann, Bracken or Axiant are no longer collectible. Apparently another large debt buyer/collector, NCO, has purchased or is about to purchase Axiant's accounts.
If you had a deal with Mann, Bracken to settle your debt, you may find that the underlying creditor or a subsequent collection agency may not honor your deal – so hold on to any paperwork you may have. As attorney Glover notes on his blog, you should contact your creditor directly if you have previously been dealing with Mann, Bracken.
Posted in Bill Collectors, General consumer bankruptcy info, Georgia Bankruptcy, a, atlanta, axiant, based, bracken, bracken , called, chris, collection, collection law firm, collector, debt, douglas, firm, including, large, mann, mann bracken, partners , the | Comments Off
Monday, January 4th, 2010
This weekend's AJC Business story entitled "Bankruptcies hit State Hard" confirmed what I have been seeing on a weekly basis in my Atlanta area bankruptcy practice – more people who were solidly "middle class" are finding themselves facing huge debt loads and the prospect of a Chapter 7 or Chapter 13 filing.
The newspaper story quoted a spokesperson from Consumer Credit Counseling who offered the following observation about the "typical" bankruptcy filer in the Northern District of Georgia:
- a homeowner
- Caucasian
- annual income of $43,000
- credit card debt of $39,000
- mortgage and car payment totaling $1,600 per month
- average credit score of 529
- negative net worth of $73,000 (up from negative $57,000 in 2008)
I think that the most telling aspect of these statistics is the amount of credit card debt vs. annual income. If you are trying to service credit card debt that is equal to your annual before tax income, you will never dig out of that hole.
In my practice I often see men and women earning $80,000, $90,000, even $100,000 or more – and often their credit card debt will be double or even triple the household income. With interest rates anywhere between 14% to 28%, it is mathematically impossible to pay off credit cards without some large lump sum payments or remedial action by the credit card companies.
It would be interesting to know what percentage of bankruptcy filers in Atlanta have tapped into their 401(k) or other retirement plans (usually a big pre-bankruptcy mistake, by the way). It would also be interesting to know how long these bankruptcy filers waited between the time they first thought about bankruptcy and the time of actual filing.
If you have filed for bankruptcy or if you are thinking about filing, I would be interested to have you post a comment answering the above questions. (more...)
Posted in Georgia Bankruptcy, bankruptcy filings in georgia, typical bankruptcy filer | Comments Off
Monday, December 14th, 2009
I have been representing debtors in bankruptcy cases filed in the Northern District of Georgia for over 20 years. Until the law changed in 2005, filing bankruptcy was a fairly straightforward process – often I would meet with a client, decide whether to file and select Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, collect information about creditors, develop a budget, then file that day.
Attorney's fees and filing fees in those days were relatively low and relatively hassle free. Most Chapter 7 cases processed through to discharge, and Chapter 13 cases worked as long as the debtor remained employed and committed to making his case work.
Fast forward to October, 2005 – the time that the BAPCPA amendment to the Bankruptcy Code went into effect. The system became significantly more complicated. Clients were expected to gather page after page of documents, lawyers were charged with performing extensive budget calculations (the median income and means test).
Fees went up because both the attorney's liability and the amount of work required increased greatly. And what is the end result? Many people with limited income and no hope of paying it back are filing Chapter 7. Others who would have fit into Chapter 7 sometimes do not qualify immediately and end up having to delay their filing for a few months. Folks with some capacity to pay end up in Chapter 13, but trustees are more demanding and Chapter 13 plans that would have worked under the old law do not always work now.
Honest, hardworking men and women have to jump through hoops and pay a lot more money. In my career I can count on the fingers of one hand the number of clients or potential clients who I felt were dishonest. Those with the goal of gaming the system are not deterred. If the purpose of the BAPCPA amendments were to ferret out fraudsters, it has been a complete waste of time.
Another unintended consequence of the BAPCPA laws – deserving debtors do not seek the relief to which they are entitled because they get frustrated with all the paperwork required. Many of these folks remain in financial limbo – unable to save or psychologically move forward because of crushing debt. In a macro-economic sense I wonder if the country is better off with these folks living in financial purgatory rather than moving on with a fresh start.
My colleague, South Carolina bankruptcy lawyer Russ DeMott, and I were chatting about this tendency of deserving debtors to give up or delay filing because of the burden that the Bankruptcy Code places on debtors in terms of document production, costly credit counseling that offers marginal benefit and record keeping. Russ calls this syndrome "financial repression" and he has written a compelling and thoughful article about this problem. Russ has given me permission to republish his article on this blog, which will be the next post published here. You should also check out Russ' Charleston bankruptcy blog. Your feedback is welcomed.
Posted in BAPCPA, Chapter 13, Chapter 7, Credit Counseling, General consumer bankruptcy info, Georgia Bankruptcy, New Bankruptcy Law | Comments Off
