Archive for the ‘Lawyer’ Category
Wednesday, May 25th, 2011
Because I handle both personal bankruptcy cases and Social Security disability cases, I frequently get questions about the interrelationship between these two areas of law. A question I get at least once a month has to do with whether a Social Security disability overpayment is dischargeable in bankruptcy.
The short answer to this is "yes," a Social Security overpayment is treated like any other unsecured debt. There are exceptions to the dischargeability of a particular debt under Section 523 of the Bankruptcy Code and exceptions to the discharge as a whole under Section 727 of the Code.
Specifically, this means, however, that fraudulent behavior can result in a finding that this Social Security debt is not dischargeable.
Overpayment issues typically arise in disability cases when a claimant continues to accept and receive disability payments even after returning to work. The question then becomes – "did the debtor/claimant knowingly and with intent to deceive the Social Security Administration continue to accept disability payments even when not entitled to do so?"
A 2009 case decided by Judge Joyce Bihary, chief judge of the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Georgia offers helpful insight into how a bankruptcy judge will analyze this issue.
In the Rodriquez vs. United States of America case, debtor Diego Rodriquez collected over $70,000 of disability benefits after returning to work. Mr. Rodriquez filed Chapter 7, then asked the Bankruptcy Court to rule on his request for waiver of overpayment. Judge Bihary found that the Bankruptcy Court did not have jurisdiction over this issue and denied Mr. Rodriquez' motion about the waiver issue, but she took the unusual step of addressing some of the substantive issues arising from the overpayment problem.
In what is known as "dicta," the judge explained that under her understanding of the law, "an overpayment debt of Social Security benefits is dischargeable" and will be treated like any other unsecured debt. The judge cited a 1982 7th Circuit case called Neavear v. Schweiker as support for her conclusion. Since Social Security did not file a timely objection to discharge, the overpayment debt owed by Mr. Rodriquez is dischargeable.
What is interesting to me about this decision are the judge's discussion of the facts. Apparently, on several occasions, Mr. Rodriquez attempted to advise Social Security about his return to work, but all of these disclosures were ignored by SSA. Further, the judge noted that Social Security had put Mr. Rodriquez in limbo by failing to respond to his request for administrative review.
The judge devotes almost a page of her decision to suggestions about how SSA might appropriately satisfy its statutory obligations to Mr. Rodriquez. Reading between the lines, it seems apparent to me that the judge found Mr. Rodriquez' testimony credible about his efforts to report his employment income to Social Security, but she did not believe Social Security's assertions (apparently gleaned from documentation and perhaps testimony) that it had not received notice of employment from Mr. Rodriquez.
The judge references Social Security's ineptitude regarding file management. Mr. Rodriquez' deliquentcy grew so large because "SSA lost debtor's file for a period of five years."
In my mind, the obvious question in an overpayment case is this – how can a debtor not be guilty of fraudulent behavior if he accepts Social Security payments while at the same time he is working and earning money. Wearing my Social Security disability lawyer hat I can tell you that Social Security's rules about trial work periods, its Ticket to Work program and its extended period of disability and work that does not reach the level of "substantial activity" is by no means intuitive and even a sophisticated claimant would not necessarily know when he might be allowed to keep his disability check as well as his paycheck.
The judge in the Rodriquez case did not reach this issue (because Social Security did not raise it) but I get the sense that the judge felt that in this case at least, the debtor tried to play by the rules but received little cooperation from Social Security and that Social Security's "unclean hands" might very well be held against the agency in a dischargeability inquiry.
So, what can we learn from the Rodriquez case? I think that if you are attempting to discharge an overpayment you will need to show that you tried to engage Social Security to resolve the issue prior to filing bankruptcy. If you were confused by Social Security's rules it would not be a bad idea to explain your areas of confusion in your correspondence with Social Security. Finally I would make sure that you and your lawyer identify specific addresses where notice of your bankruptcy filing ought to go. Social Security is such a bloated bureaucracy that they will most likely not file an objection in time – there is no need to give them added life by not offering notice at the correct address.
Posted in 1982, 7th, Bankruptcy, Creditor discharge actions, Lawyer, a, administration, and, bihary, called, case, cases, circuit, cited, continue, debt , deceive, disability, discharge of social security disability overpayments, earning, employment, handle, hat, intent, judge, money , mr, my, neavear, overpayment, overpayment , personal, references, rodriquez the, schweiker, security, social, social security overpayment and bankruptcy, the, treated, unsecured, v, waiver, wearing, working | Comments Off
Sunday, June 13th, 2010
With the news full of foreclosure statistics showing huge increases along with stories of self-righteous Members of Congress asserting their heartfelt concern for "struggling homeowners" little attention is paid to the question of whether a homeowner ought to fight to save his home. My friend and colleague, Charleston bankruptcy lawyer Russ DeMott were recently discussing this issue and I invited him to prepare a guest post about this very topic:
Chapter 13 bankruptcy is a tool that can be used to save your home from foreclosure. But the big question sometimes isn’t “can I save my home,” but “should I save it?"
We all know that there’s been an epidemic of foreclosure resulting from the recent economic downturn. Jobs were lost, values plummeted, and foreclosures have been on the rise.
So it’s natural to wonder, “can I file Chapter 13 bankruptcy to save my home from foreclosure?” However, when you meet with a bankruptcy lawyer to explore your options, you need to explore all your options—bankruptcy and otherwise. And that might be not saving your home.
When you’re having financial problems and seek advice, you should take the opportunity to review your entire financial situation. Can you afford your vehicle payments? Can you “tighten the belt” and cut back on some unnecessary expenses? And most significantly, “should you try to save your home?”
In my Charleston, South Carolina bankruptcy practice, I get calls every week from folks facing foreclosure. The potential bankruptcy client’s question is always a “can we?” Can we stop foreclosure? Can we make the lender listen? Can we catch up on these payments we’ve missed? Can we protect our home? Can Chapter 13 bankruptcy help?
But I always focus on the “should we.” Here are some factors to consider when deciding whether you should use Chapter 13 to keep your home:
- Can you afford the mortgage payments? Do you have large house payments you can’t really afford, perhaps with more than one mortgage? For example, it may be that you can afford payments of $1800 a month, but your current payments are $2800 per month. Absent a mortgage modification, that’s a tough nut to crack every month.
- Is your interest rate scheduled to adjust? It may be that you can afford your payments now but maybe not once your payments adjust.
- Do you have equity in your home? (Equity is the value of the property less any liens (like mortgages, outstanding taxes, assessments, and home owner’s dues). Lately, I’ve been getting calls from clients who not only have no equity, but actually have “negative equity.” For example, your house might be worth $250,000 and you owe $350,000. If that’s the case, you might not want to try to save your home from foreclosure. You’d actually have more equity if you rented!
- Is this where you want to live for the indefinite future? If not, perhaps you should use your financial problems to reevaluate where you want to live. Perhaps renting in another area would lessen your commute or allow your children to enroll in a better school?
These are just a few factors you should consider. You should weight all the pros and cons of saving your home. You can then have your bankruptcy lawyer help you decide whether filing Chapter 13 bankruptcy to save your home really makes sense.
Jonathan's note: in addition to the very relevant points Russ makes, let me add this: if you decide that saving your house in a Chapter 13 does not make sense, a "fresh start" Chapter 7 could be appropriate. Similarly, you can still file a Chapter 13 to reorganize your other debts while you surrender your home. My point – personal bankruptcy is not a "one size fits all" solution – a good bankruptcy lawyer can offer you several options to consider, many of which you may have never considered.
If there is one lament that I hear from my colleagues, it is this – "I wish my clients would call me earlier, when there is time to evaluate bankruptcy and non-bankruptcy options." Sometimes, when there are only days or hours to go before a foreclosure, an emergency Chapter 13 may be your only choice. Even if bankruptcy is something you really do not want to think about, you would be wise to establish a relationship with a bankruptcy lawyer before you end up facing a crisis.
Posted in 2800, Bankruptcy, Chapter 13 issues, Foreclosure, Foreclosure issues, Lawyer, Mortgage, Russ Demott, a, absent, bankruptcy and foreclosure, charleston, client’s, consent to foreclosure, contest foreclosure, deed in lieu of foreclosure, demott, equity, facing, folks, foreclosure , home when, home , home ” in, huge, increases, modification, month , my, oppose foreclosure sale, potential, question, russ, save, saving, showing, statistics, the, you’d, you’re | Comments Off
Thursday, March 11th, 2010
Recently I met with a client who was looking into filing bankruptcy because of credit card and medical debt. Among his creditors, however, was an individual, an insurance company and fines due a local county. When I asked about this, he explained that about a year ago, he was involved in an auto accident that was his fault. He further explained that the individual sued him and that damages awarded were more than his insurance coverage, and that he also had fines because the accident occurred when he was under the influence.
He was unhappy to learn that Section 523(a)(9) of the Bankruptcy Code specifically excepts from discharge debts arising from the "death or personal injury caused by the debtor’s operation of a motor vehicle, vessel, or aircraft if such operation was unlawful because the debtor was intoxicated from using alcohol, a drug, or another substance."
I read this Code section to mean that my client cannot discharge:
- any damage award due to the accident victim
- restitution ordered by the local county court
- fines imposed by the local county court
What about property damage arising from this drunk driving accident. I read the Code section to limit non-dischargeability to personal injury so I do not think that property damages would be excepted here.
Washington D.C. bankruptcy lawyer Morgan Fisher wrote a post about DUI damages and bankruptcy dischargeability last year. He notes that an insurance company seeking subrogation damages (recovery of car repair payments from the negligent driver by an insurance company) could argue against dischargeability under other provisions of Section 523. I believe that Morgan is referring to Bankruptcy Code Section 523(a)(6) which excepts from discharge debts arising from the "willful and malicious injury by the debtor to another entity or to the property of another entity."
Morgan also notes that a local Bankruptcy Judge will look to the state law in the jurisdiction where the criminal prosecution is based to determine culpability. I suspect this means that if you are convicted of DUI in a state where the applicable blood alcohol limit is .08, but you file bankruptcy in a state where the limit is .10, you would not be able to argue that Section 523(a)(9) does not apply to you.
I would also suggest that any DUI defendant who is contemplating a plea should look carefully at the language of 523(a)(9) – how the plea is structured in state court could have a bearing on whether the debt was dischargeable. I have not seen this happen, but I would think that a Bankruptcy Judge might have to hold an evidentiary hearing if the state court DUI plea bargain did not conclusively speak to driving under the influence.
Posted in 523(a)(6), 523(a)(9), Bankruptcy, Chapter 7 issues, Creditor discharge actions, DUI and bankruptcy, DWI and bankruptcy, Insurance, Lawyer, a, accident , alcohol, an, and, applicable, bargain, blood, company, court, d c, damages, driving, drunk, dui, entity, excepted, fines, fisher, here washington, injury, limit, malicious, morgan, non-dischageability, plea, post, recovery, seeking, state, subrogation, subrogation and bankruptcy, the, willful, wrote | Comments Off
Friday, February 5th, 2010
There are many reasons that bankruptcy filing rates are so high. Clearly an unexpected job loss or reduction in earnings can lead many honest, hardworking people into a bankruptcy lawyer's office. When a job loss is coupled with a divorce, I think that the likelihood of bankruptcy by husband or wife goes up exponentially.
I recently read a column written by attorney John Mayoue, a divorce lawyer here in Atlanta who is known for his representation of celebrities and other high profile clients. John notes that in the domestic relations legal community, Atlanta is known as the "divorce belt." In the bankruptcy lawyer community, Atlanta is known for having one of the highest bankruptcy filing rates per capita. I do not think that this is a coincidence.
Just as an ethical bankruptcy lawyer will advise you to search for alternatives to Chapter 7 or Chapter 13, a thoughtful family law attorney will advise you to search for alternatives to divorce. Bankruptcy or divorce may be inevitable, but when you seek legal counsel, look for a lawyer who does not offer "one size fits all" solutions and recommends alternatives – this would be a good sign that you are talking with a lawyer who has your best interests at heart.
John was gracious enough to give me permission to reprint his thoughtful article about why couples struggling in their marriages ought to consider alternatives to divorce. I recommend that you take his message to heart.
Divorce Lawyer John Mayoue Offers Advice to Couples Contemplating Divorce
The divorce rates in the United States are some of the highest in the world. Increased financial pressure brought on by the current economy is fueling the fire for marriages already in jeopardy, and the rapidly increasing number of homeforeclosures further demonstrates the severe consequences these pressures can produce.
According to Atlanta, Georgia based divorce attorney John C. Mayoue, who has been counseling couples through divorce cases for more than thirty years, the approaching holiday season will cause these numbers to spike further and will also be a busy time for lawyers specializing in divorce cases, as the holiday season often proves to be a breaking point for marriages in crisis.
“During the holidays, people’s pent-up thoughts about relationships and careers and where they are with life become intensified,” Mayoue says. “In December, for example, we have the highest number of suicides, divorce filings and bankruptcies of any month. It's just a very difficult time for people.”
Although our society makes divorce seem to be an easy and acceptable way out for couples who aren’t quite happy in their situation, Mayoue cautions couples not to be too hasty to start the divorce process. Divorces that make it to trial are painful and embarrassing, and the results are often not fair for both parties involved. If you are considering divorce, Mayoue suggest taking the following steps first.
1. Try to work out your differences
Ask yourself why you want a divorce. Are you just responding to life’s pressures? Are you looking for a way out of a stressful situation and not just your marriage? Or do you have legitimate concerns that are truly irreconcilable?
Ask yourself if this is your only option. Have you made every effort to communicate with your spouse and work things out together? Have you tried counseling or outside help?
More importantly, consider all of the consequences of divorce. Are there children involved? How will this affect them? Would the divorce be the best solution for everyone in the family or only the adults involved? Will the family be financially ruined by the process in the forms of home foreclosure, credit crises or worse?
Before you drag your family through a process that can make existing rifts even deeper and harder to overcome, make sure that you really want to go through with this life changing and emotionally taxing process.
2. If you can’t find a resolution, try to settle out of court
If at all possible, try to settle your case outside of court with the help of your attorneys. When you do take your case to trial, you lose control over important aspects of your case to the decision of the judge or jury, depending on your state. This can lead to painful custody rulings, alimony or settlement decisions and more.
Even if you feel like you are right in your claims, in a courtroom, your case is only as solid as the evidence you can produce. Judges tend to have biases and not all states will send divorce cases to a jury trial. Truth may not always win out, and oftentimes these proceedings become incredibly painful and embarrassing.
“I am always going to make every reasonable effort to get a case settled first,” Mayoue says, “because settlement is something that the parties can control. They can basically control things such as custody, visitation and the allocation of assets and debts. And the courtroom is a risky environment for anyone.”
3. Educate yourself before going to trial
Before you do anything, make sure to get educated. Use your attorney’s knowledge to understand the proceedings, possible outcomes and unexpected or painful events that you need to be prepared for.
“Divorce is hell for the vast majority of people,” Mayoue says. “People get angry, people get lost in the process of the courts and they lose everything. This can be avoided if they are calm and are educated about the process.”
Mayoue’s law practice is based in Atlanta, in the heart of the new “divorce belt,” a name which the South has recently earned by having the highest divorce rates in the country. Given the environment in which he operates, he says that his goals as a divorce attorney are to educate people about their options and the process and to help people who have thoroughly thought through their options and have decided divorce is the only answer for them.
“I really do think that we lawyers have an obligation to educate the public,” Mayoue says, “and it seems to me to be not very good consumerism to walk into a lawyer's office knowing absolutely nothing, before paying someone several hundred dollars. I've always found it peculiar that people do not get educated in a legal matter that affects 50-plus percent of all people who get married. Yet if you had an illness, you would certainly read up about it, if you had a business you were interested in getting involved in, you would certainly read about it.”
Posted in Advice, Alternatives To Bankruptcy, Attorney, Avoiding Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy budgets, Divorce, Divorce and bankruptcy issues, John Mayoue, Lawyer, alternatives to divorce, and, atlanta, avoiding divorce, bankruptcy and divorce, based, c, cautions, contemplating, couples, divorce the, earned, embarrassing “i, georgia, heart divorce, highest, incredibly, john, mayoue, message, offers, painful, proceedings, rates, suggest, the | Comments Off
