Bankruptcy Questions Answered

Lawsuit Alleges Mortgage Fraud by Deutsche Bank

News reports this week announce that the U.S. Department of Justice has initiated a lawsuit against Deutsche Bank, one of the world’s largest, claiming that the institution lied to federal regulators in order to secure taxpayer-funded insurance for less-than-secure mortgages.

Here’s a look at the details and some of the underlying issues.

The Charges against Deutsche Bank

According to the lawsuit, Deutsche Bank and its subsidiary MortgageIT:

• Initiated risky mortgage loans to homebuyers. Some of these loans may have been subprime, and since their initiation, sources indicate, about a third have defaulted.
• Lied to federal regulators. While the loans themselves may have been a bad move financially, what interests prosecutors is what happens next: that Deutsche Bank allegedly lied to officials with the Federal Housing Authority (FHA) in order to secure insurance for the shoddy loans.
• Got taxpayer-backed insurance for questionable loans. Because of its reportedly false claims that it was evaluating its mortgages for default risk, Deutsche Bank managed to secure FHA funding (which comes from tax dollars) for the questionable loans.
• Required money from the government when the loans defaulted. Now, as many as 12,500 of Deutsche Bank’s loans have apparently defaulted (meaning that the homes have gone into foreclosure), leaving the government responsible for covering the losses. The money goes to those investors who own the mortgage debt. Sources note that, to date, defaulted Deutsche Bank loans have cost the government more than $386 million.

Because of all these allegations, the Justice Department is reportedly suing the bank for $1 billion, an amount that represents the dollar amount lost plus individual penalties for each mortgage that went into default.

What Mortgage Lending Rules Were Broken?

The government’s lawsuit charges that Deutsche Bank and MortgageIT failed to follow the rules required of anyone interested in federal mortgage insurance. These rules require lenders to:

• Annually verify various records of mortgage borrowers, including credit reports, incomes and record of employment. This measure is to make sure borrowers are not at risk of defaulting.
• Examine any loan that goes into default shortly after being originated in an effort to prevent and eliminate careless lending techniques.
• Act in the government’s best interest, because any money needed to guarantee loans that defaulted would come directly from taxpayers’ pockets.

The lawsuit claims that Deutsche Bank did none of these things and so is both on the hook for the money lost by the government and responsible for paying penalties for breaking the rules of engagement for obtaining federal insurance.

Some sources suggest that the Deutsche Bank lawsuit could be the first of many; after all, reckless lending techniques were fairly common during the housing boom that touched off the current recession.

Posted in Bankruptcy and Predatory Lending, Consumer Protection, Economy, Mortgage, Mortgage Foreclosure, predatory lending | Comments Off

Payday Lender Forks Over Cash to Settle with FTC

The Federal Trade Commission announced this month that it has settled charges with two men who allegedly bilked consumers out of hundreds of thousands of dollars by using an online payday loan “matching” scam. Here’s what the FTC says happened:

• The web site offered to match consumers with payday lenders in their areas.
• As part of the online application process, consumers were reportedly sent to a page that had an offer for a debit card. The “yes” box to order the debit card was pre-checked on this page.
• Consumers who clicked through to the “finish” page without realizing they’d agreed to the embedded debit card offer were automatically signed up for the debit card. Clicking through reportedly also meant consumers granted authorization for their bank accounts to be charged for the funds.
• Victims of the scam were apparently charged up to $54.95 extra for the debit card they did not intend to apply for.

Terms of the Settlement

The newest settlement, which reflects an amended charge filed in April 2010, means that the men charged with the offenses, Matthew Patterson and Mark Benning, will be prohibited from doing the following:

• Presenting false or misleading information about any product or service, including information about how customers will be charged or billed;
• Misrepresenting the cost or status of a product or service (e.g. incorrectly suggesting that something is free or a “bonus”) for any of its terms and conditions;
• Charging consumers without complete disclosure of how much will be charged to them, all terms and conditions of the transaction, what billing information will be used and to what account the payment will be charged; and
• Failing to keep track of affiliates to make sure that they comply with all the above terms (and those laid out in the court order).

In addition to these restrictions, the FTC settlement imposes a $5.2 million judgment on the two men, which will reportedly be suspended for Patterson once he pays $800,000 over a period of 10 years and for Benning when he provides the court with money raised from the sale of his house.

Protecting Your Finances from Predatory Lenders

While a number of consumer protection groups and government organizations exist to police the market and keep scammers from finding new victims, perhaps your best defense against predatory lenders is knowledge.

Take a look at this predatory lending glossary to get an idea of what kinds of loans and offers qualify as “predatory” and how you can keep your money from falling into the wrong hands (and keep yourself from falling into bankruptcy).

Posted in Bankruptcy and Predatory Lending, FTC, Legal Info, payday loans, predatory lending, scams | Comments Off

Personal Finance Taking a Hit as Banks Close in Poorer Areas

A recent report from the New York Times highlights a troubling change in the banking industry: according to the Times, banks across the country have taken to closing branches in middle- and low-income neighborhoods even as they maintained or opened new branches in wealthier areas.

Personal finance experts of all stripes are understandably upset about the shift – fewer available banks could have disastrous consequences for the financial health of families in affected areas.

The High Cost of Being “Unbanked”

Here’s a look at some of the potential ramifications closing banks in poorer areas.

• Increased reliance on payday lenders and check cashers: Without nearby bank branches, families in effected communities will be pushed to rely for their financial needs on so-called “predatory” lenders such as payday loan stores, cash advance outfits and check cashers. Such organizations can contribute to a cycle of poverty by charging high interest rates and fees for their services without offering clients a vehicle for saving their money.
• Diminished saving incentives and opportunities: Without ready access to savings accounts, people living in communities without brick-and-mortar banks have a slimmer chance at reaping the benefits of opening a savings account (including earning interest on their money). In the long term, this can make financial emergencies particularly devastating, and can lead to bankruptcy filings.
• Damaged credit and decreased ability to get loans: One thing that a savings account does is to bolster a person’s credit rating – when lenders run a credit check, they can view the status of a potential borrower’s bank accounts. Those with accounts in good standing who have a cash cushion available to them are considered better credit risks than those without any cash reserves. This can affect interest rates a borrower pays and thus determine how expensive or inexpensive a loan is.

A Look at the Numbers

So how dramatic was the shift toward closing banks in lower-income areas in the last two years? Here’s a look at the numbers, as reported in the Times:

• More closings than openings: 2010 reportedly marked the first year in a decade and a half that more banks closed their doors in the U.S. than opened them.
• Number of closings: In 2009, the country boasted 99,550 bank branches; last year, that number had fallen to 98,517 branches, nearly a 1,000-branch drop.
• Number of unbanked Americans: It seems that as many as 30 million Americans rely primarily or in part on “non-traditional” financial institutions like check cashers and payday lenders – that’s about 10 percent of the country.
• Big banks participating: While some smaller banks reportedly closed branches as part of consolidation moves to survive serious debt, it seems that Bank of America also closed 25 branches in communities with moderate income levels and opened 14 in richer places.

So why is this happening? On proposed reason is that the Community Reinvestment Act, meant to improve financial opportunities in poorer areas, is being insufficiently enforced.

Posted in Bankruptcy and Predatory Lending, Bankruptcy and the Economy, Consumer Credit, payday loans, predatory lending, recession | Comments Off

Avoid Refund Anticipation Loans this Tax Season!

If you’re counting on a tax refund this year, you may have heard of refund anticipation loans (or RALs), which some tax-preparation services offer to people as part of tax preparation services. But these loans, as most consumer advocates will agree, are not a good deal for you the consumer.

Here’s a look at why tax refund anticipation loans (sometimes called a refund anticipation check) may not be all that they're promised, and what the federal government is doing to help you avoid them.

Why RALs Are a Bad Financial Move

So what is a refund anticipation loan? Basically:

• It’s a cash advance loan that charges you a high interest rate to get some of your tax return dollars earlier than you would have otherwise gotten them.
• Some tax preparation services offer them to customers who are expecting a tax return that year. Generally, a customer can receive the money for a “fee” of some kind – just like a payday loan. In fact, RALs are very much akin to payday loans: their “fees” are just high interest rates disguised to look harmless.
• RALs eat into whatever tax return you can expect to get. After all, you have to pay for the privilege of receiving your money early, and that money comes out of whatever you would have received from the federal government.
• RALs can also set you up for debt. What happens if there’s a mistake in your tax forms or if you end up getting a smaller return than you expected? If you take out a refund anticipation loan for the full amount of your return and then receive a smaller actual return from the government, you’ll still be responsible fore repaying the loan amount in full. Yikes.
• RALs may present a tempting prospect to unbanked Americans – after all, if you don’t have a bank account, waiting for a refund check from the government and then paying to have it cashed can seem like a waste of time and money. But paying for the RAL itself will almost always cost more.

So What Are the Feds Doing about the RAL Problem?

This year, the Treasury is launching a new program that offers an alternative to refund anticipation loans, particularly aimed at people without bank accounts who might be susceptible to the RAL’s siren song. Here are the gist:

• Debit card distribution: The Treasury will be sending debit cards pre-loaded with people’s refunds to 600,000 Americans selected at random to participate.
• Experiment to see what works: If the program proves popular, the pre-loaded debit card system could become standard practice in future years.
• Varied terms on cards: In order to test various features, the debit cards will come with a variety of features. Some will require no fees to make purchases or withdraw money from ATMs, while others will charge small fees to be activated, check balances or use at certain retailers.

The goal of this program, it seems, is to offer a lower-cost alternative to RALs and RACs to the people most likely to be tempted to choose them.

Posted in Bankruptcy and Predatory Lending, Economy, Financial Literacy, predatory lending, saving money | Comments Off

What’s the Latest on Payday Loans?

In the last few years, lawmakers in many states have taken on payday loans as a pet cause, passing legislation that outlaws or severely limits what these predatory lending institutions can charge and how they can operate.

But a recent post at CreditBloggers points out that many payday lending operations are still thriving, for a number of reasons. Here’s a look at the latest payday lending landscape and a reminder of just how expensive these seemingly innocuous loans actually are.

Restrictions on Payday Lending

In recent years, state lawmakers have put a variety of limits on how payday loan stores can operate:

• Ohio: State legislators limited payday lending interest rates to 28 percent (a significant decrease from the 400+ percent some lenders charge annually). The legislation affected the payday lenders, naturally, but apparently did not result in their flight from the state.
• Montana: In November’s election, 72 percent of voters reportedly voted to make payday lending illegal in the state, and a new measure that went into effect on the first day of 2011 limits interest rates to 36 percent. The result, it seems, is that most payday loan stores have packed up and headed out, unable to make sufficient profit under those terms.
• Arizona: When a law permitting high-interest lending was not renewed, sources note that some lenders remained in the state but one national chain (Advance America Cash Advance Centers) quit the state entirely.
• Other states: Elsewhere in the country, legislation has been introduced and/or passed to limit the amount of interest payday lenders can charge and how they can operate their businesses.

So why, with so many restrictions in place and so much public energy devoted to eliminating payday lending abuses, are some payday lenders still thriving?

The Credit Crunch and Payday Lending

Unfortunately, one effect the recession has had on the lending landscape is that many lenders have tightened their lending standards. In fact, while the number of banks in the nation reportedly increased between 2007 and 2009, the dollar amount of loans they issued dropped by a staggering 51 percent.

What does that mean for ordinary consumers (and especially those whose credit is less than pristine)?

• Fewer borrowing options: With banks holding onto their money more tightly, fewer consumers have a chance at getting loans from these mainstream, trustworthy sources.
• Prime ground for alternative lenders: When people need money, though, they have to get it from somewhere. And, because of the way their business model works, payday lenders are often the go-to place for folks who can’t get loans elsewhere.
• Serious danger for serious debt: Unfortunately, just because payday loans may seem like your only option does not mean that they’re any safer than they used to be. Payday loans can lead to a debilitating cycle of debt and can come with interest rates of more than 400 percent over the course of a year! Remember that many financial advisors recommend almost every other source of financing over payday loans.

Posted in Bankruptcy and Predatory Lending, Consumer Credit, Consumer Protection, predatory lending | Comments Off

What You Can Learn from 2010’s Top Scams

While many people are looking forward to the new year, it’s also important to take time to look back on what we learned from 2010. So here’s a review of some of the major scams that we saw in the past year (listed on WalletPop.com) and what you can do to protect your finances from similar ones.

Protect Your Finances from Future Scams

• Mortgage Relief Scams: Scammers know that people who are feeling desperate make good targets, so times of economic distress provide scam artists with plenty of opportunities for ripping people off. Scams offering fake mortgage relief take advantage of people in danger of losing their homes by offering fake services to negotiate with lenders or change mortgage terms, and real opportunities for struggling homeowners to throw away money they can’t afford to lose. Lesson: You are the only one responsible for saving your home and/or mortgage. If you want help, you must ask for it and do some work to find the right group to provide it.
• Debt Relief & Reduction Scams: Like mortgage relief scams, debt relief scams work by charging consumers steep upfront fees for debt-reduction services that the scammer never delivers. Though new rules have strengthened consumer protections against debt settlement companies (which are sometimes little more than dolled-up scammers), many groups are apparently still finding ways to get around these rules. Lesson: Do your homework before committing to any debt relief firm. Visit the Better Business Bureau, compare fees among companies, and consider your alternatives (like credit counseling and bankruptcy). Most importantly, if something sounds too good to be true, don’t believe it.
• Robocall Scams: These scams work by contacting vast numbers of consumers with recorded telephone messages and promising some attractive service (like quick debt reduction) – naturally, for a steep price. Lesson: Getting out of debt is almost never a quick process. If someone promises a quick fix for your debt, turn the other way and run (and don’t write any checks in the meantime).
• Identity Theft Scams: Identity theft is perhaps one of the most troubling crimes of the information age – correcting the damage done by identity thieves can take hours of time and lead to anger and frustration. And identity thieves are masters at taking advantage of new technologies to get our information – emails, text messages, online buying sites and other popular media have all been used by identity thieves to lure in unsuspecting consumers. Lesson: Guard your personal information carefully. Don’t ever wire money to strangers, reply to unfamiliar emails, text sensitive information or otherwise reveal too much of your personal data.

Keep Your Money Safe in 2011

The sad truth about scams is this: there will always be a new scam out there – the nature of legislation is that it is slow and retroactive, meaning that unscrupulous individuals will always be able to outpace laws. But if you approach your everyday transactions and interactions with reasonable skepticism, you should be able to keep yourself and your money safe.

Posted in Financial Literacy, Foreclosure, Identity Theft, predatory lending, scams | Comments Off

FTC Halts Robocall Credit Card Scam

The Federal Trade Commission announced this week that it has shut down operations of a company charged with a scam that involved illegally making robocalls and taking consumers’ money by falsely promising them lowered credit card interest rates.

The scam, according to the FTC, worked like this:

• Automated phone calls: The company, JPM Accelerated Services, reportedly set up robocalls to thousands of homes (some of which were on the National Do Not Call Registry). The calls indicated that the company was a “card services” provider and little else.
• False promises: Telephone respondents who pressed one were apparently transferred to live telemarketers who offered to lower their credit card interest rates and thus save them thousands of dollars. The price of the service, sources note, ranged from $495 to $995, and the company apparently guaranteed a full refund to anyone not satisfied with the results.
• Failure to follow through: Of course, because this was a scam, the company did not follow through, and thousands of consumers in need of financial relief ended up losing even more money they couldn’t afford.
• Serious settlement fine announced: As part of the settlement, judgments of $5.9 million against JPM Accelerated Services and $3.2 million against related scammers have been imposed; however, the defendants at this time are unable to pay the fines, according to sources. The judgments represent the amount of money consumers were bilked out of as a result of the scams.

The Truth about Lowering Your Credit Card Interest Rates

Scams like the one recently halted by the FTC are all too common, perhaps because unscrupulous scammers know that financially strapped consumers are often willing to take even big chances to get out of debt.

But if you’re interested in lowering your credit card interest rates, the truth is that you can negotiate with your creditors yourself. Here’s how:

• Figure out where you stand financially: Look at your monthly budget and figure out what you can afford to pay toward your credit card debt each month.
• Stop charging: When you commit to paying off credit card debt, it’s important to stop putting new charges on your accounts.
• Look at your bills: Lay out your most recent bills and figure out what you owe, what your current interest rates are, and what your current monthly payments are.
• Call your credit card issuers: When you’re armed with all this information, contact your credit card companies directly, explain your situation and ask for some sort of lowered payment. It’s usually a good idea to ask for something specific, like lowered interest rates, lowered monthly payments, or a reduction of the total principal you owe.
• Reassess your situation: If your credit card issuer denies you, you may want to explore other debt-relief options, like filing for personal bankruptcy.

Posted in Bankruptcy and Predatory Lending, Consumer Credit, Consumer Protection, Credit Card, Credit and Bankruptcy, predatory lending | Comments Off

A Better Alternative to Payday Loans?

The financial dangers of taking on a payday loan (a short-term, high-interest loan offered to people with weak financial histories) generally outweigh any benefits. For cash-strapped Americans who need to make rent or utility payments, though, payday loans are often the only viable source of cash.

But, according to a post on WiseBread.com, that might change soon: it seems that, in some parts of the country, a more consumer friendly alternative to payday loans is cropping up.

More Affordable Small Loans

Here’s a look at what might soon act as a better option for people looking to borrow a little money for a short amount of time.

• FDIC pilot program: Between February 2008 and February 2010, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation tested a program that allowed Americans to borrow up to $2,500 for a period greater than 90 days. Interest rates were capped at 36 percent (but were often less).
• Non-payment loan requirements: In addition to making regular payments on their loans, borrowers were often required to meet other criteria, such as opening and putting money into a savings account, taking a financial literacy class and more. These measures were instituted to reduce or eliminate a borrower’s need for small dollar amount loans in the future.

According to the FDIC’s web site, the experiment showed promising results in many of the volunteer test banks (28 across the country). Now, the question many consumer advocates are asking is when will such programs be more widely available.

Finding Affordable Loans Near You

If you’re in need of a loan but don’t have the credit score or history to qualify for a traditional bank loan, you may be able to find a small dollar amount lender near you that won’t charge punishing interest rates. Here’s what to look for:

• Check out your local banks: Sources note that national banks like Bank of America and Wells Fargo have not yet hopped on the small loan bandwagon, but various regional banks across the country do offer a variety of small loans. To find out what your options are, call some local banks and ask about their non-traditional lending programs.
• Visit a credit union: If no banks in your area offer smaller loans, check out some of the credit unions. Because they’re structured on a more community-centric model, credit unions may have more alternatives for local members without other options.

It’s uncertain right now whether these programs will catch on (and even whether they’ll get some sort of national support to help them grow), but it seems that the FDIC’s chair, Sheila Blair, hopes they do.

To learn more about small dollar amount loans and how they might help you, visit the FDIC’s web site (link above) or check out the full WiseBread.com article.

Posted in Bankruptcy and Predatory Lending, Consumer Credit, Credit and Bankruptcy, consumer debt, predatory lending | Comments Off

What New Debt Settlement Rules Mean for You

The Federal Trade Commission issued new rules governing how debt settlement firms can charge consumers for their services. The new rules prohibit debt settlement firms from charging upfront fees for their services, which in theory will prevent some of the predatory practices that cost consumers so much money in the past.

Here’s a summary of some of the potential side effects these new rules might have on the debt settlement process.

Fewer Ads, More Honest Claims

• A drop-off in ads claiming to settle debts for little money: A ban on hefty upfront fees will mean that simply bringing customers through the door will no longer guarantee income for debt settlement firms, which in turn will mean that dropping money on TV and radio commercials may no longer be worthwhile financially.
• More selective consumer selection: Now that debt settlement firms cannot charge every customer large fees, they’ll have to more carefully choose which customers they agree to help. This will likely be good news, regardless of your goals. If you’re a good candidate for debt settlement, visiting a debt settlement firm may have a greater chance of helping you than in the past. And if you’re not a good candidate, the debt settlers may be less likely to waste your time and money with their services.
• Claims made based on all customers: Before the FTC’s rules took effect, debt settlement firms commonly made claims based only on the settlement experiences of their most successful customers. Now, though, companies must advertise using figures that represent all their customers’ experiences, meaning that the figures should more honestly represent what the company may be able to do for you.
• Some closures of debt settlement firms: Some debt settlement firms may no longer have a workable business model without upfront fees from customers, which could mean closures in debt settlement firms.
• “Innovative” trickery: And, finally, as with any implementation of new rules, some debt settlers may try to find ways around the new requirements. As always, you are still responsible for making sure your money and financial health is in good hands.

Debt Settlement without a Firm

If you’re struggling with debt and are trying to figure out which debt-relief option might work best for you (bankruptcy, debt settlement, credit counseling, etc.), remember that you can contact your creditors without any help from a third party. By exploring all of these options, you may find the debt-relief option that works best for you.

Posted in Bankruptcy and Predatory Lending, Debt Settlement, Filing Bankruptcy, Financial Literacy, debt collection, predatory lending | Comments Off

FTC Deals with Payday Lending Scammers

The Federal Trade Commission has announced that it has reached a settlement deal with a payday loan company that was illegally garnishing the wages of some of its borrowers. Here are the basic facts of the case and some pointers to keep you from getting burned:

• The company offered payday loans. The companies known as GeteCash and LoanPointe reportedly offered consumers payday loans, a type of short-term, high-interest loan considered by many financial analysts to be “predatory.”
• Consumers agreed to online terms and conditions. In order to apply for a loan online, consumers apparently had to check an agreement of terms box. One of these terms, it seems, indicated that the company could garnish a borrower’s wages (that is, take money from their paycheck) if she failed to make loan payments.
• The garnishment was illegal. According to the FTC’s charges, the payday lending company overreached its legal debt-collection abilities. While laws permit federal agencies to garnish the wages of someone who owes the government money, non-government groups aren’t afforded the same privilege.

The FTC apparently took action because the payday lenders not only indicated that they had the same collection rights as the government, but also claimed that their customers knew that they had agreed to the garnishment clause.

Because of the FTC’s actions, those behind the garnishment scam are barred from certain lending practices and responsible for a $38,133 judgment that has been suspended because of their current financial situation.

Don’t Get Burned by Payday Lenders

In recent years, legislators have taken action against the payday lending industry, which can lead struggling consumers into a perilous cycle of debt. Many financial insiders recommend avoiding payday lenders at all costs because of their high cost. Here are some options you might consider before turning to a payday lender if you’re in need of cash:

• Friends and family: Asking to borrow money from a loved one may be hard, so consider this twist: offer to do chores or run errands in exchange for some money. Or, if you’re already swamped, volunteer to write up a formal payment agreement outlining the terms of repayment.
• Your boss: If you have a decent relationship with your boss, consider asking for extra work and/or an advance on pay. This may not work more than once, but if you’re in a serious pinch, an advance on wages will likely hurt your finances less than a payday loan.
• Your credit card: If you aren’t maxed out on your plastic, using it to pay is generally less expensive than taking out a payday loan. Credit cards generally have lower interest rates than payday lenders and offer you more options for paying them back.

If you’ve already turned to payday lenders to keep up with financial obligations, you may want to consider the financial relief that filing for bankruptcy could offer you.

Posted in Bankruptcy News, Bankruptcy and Predatory Lending, Consumer Protection, payday lending, predatory lending | Comments Off